From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@mykernel.net>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.14 47/99] ovl: skip checking lower file's i_writecount on truncate
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 20:15:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210910001558.173296-47-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210910001558.173296-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@mykernel.net>
[ Upstream commit b71759ef1e1730db81dab98e9dab9455e8c7f5a2 ]
It is possible that a directory tree is shared between multiple overlay
instances as a lower layer. In this case when one instance executes a file
residing on the lower layer, the other instance denies a truncate(2) call
on this file.
This only happens for truncate(2) and not for open(2) with the O_TRUNC
flag.
Fix this interference and inconsistency by removing the preliminary
i_writecount check before copy-up.
This means that unlike on normal filesystems truncate(argv[0]) will now
succeed. If this ever causes a regression in a real world use case this
needs to be revisited.
One way to fix this properly would be to keep a correct i_writecount in the
overlay inode, but that is difficult due to memory mapping code only
dealing with the real file/inode.
Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@mykernel.net>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst | 3 +++
fs/overlayfs/inode.c | 6 ------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst
index 455ca86eb4fc..7da6c30ed596 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst
@@ -427,6 +427,9 @@ b) If a file residing on a lower layer is opened for read-only and then
memory mapped with MAP_SHARED, then subsequent changes to the file are not
reflected in the memory mapping.
+c) If a file residing on a lower layer is being executed, then opening that
+file for write or truncating the file will not be denied with ETXTBSY.
+
The following options allow overlayfs to act more like a standards
compliant filesystem:
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/inode.c b/fs/overlayfs/inode.c
index b288843e6b42..6566294c5fd6 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/inode.c
@@ -33,12 +33,6 @@ int ovl_setattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct dentry *dentry,
goto out;
if (attr->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) {
- struct inode *realinode = d_inode(ovl_dentry_real(dentry));
-
- err = -ETXTBSY;
- if (atomic_read(&realinode->i_writecount) < 0)
- goto out_drop_write;
-
/* Truncate should trigger data copy up as well */
full_copy_up = true;
}
--
2.30.2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-10 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210910001558.173296-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2021-09-10 0:15 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.14 46/99] ovl: copy up sync/noatime fileattr flags Sasha Levin
2021-09-10 5:35 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-09-11 14:36 ` Sasha Levin
2021-09-10 0:15 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210910001558.173296-47-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=cgxu519@mykernel.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).