From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@mykernel.net>,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ovl: consistent behavior for immutable/append-only inodes
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 09:55:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJfpeguateThdqWPdF1P-OFuxYdrdgtz7dj-=ewBft-k2gDSdQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxiHyd4iRxgtDGorNK8fzBJgViUXxgAtS7nfAdHMQeiAew@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 09:31, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Taking a step back.
>
> The main problem this is trying to solve is losing persistent inode flags
> on copy-up.
>
> If this was just NOATIME and SYNC the solution would have been
> simple - copy up the flags along with other metadata we copy up.
>
> We wouldn't even need to limit ourselves to the 4 vfs inode flags
> in ovl_copyflags(). We could add the the copied up flags more
> fs specific flags that we know to be safe and rational to copy
> such as NOCOW, NODUMP and DIRSYNC.
>
> The secondary problem is that copying IMMUTABLE/APPEND
> to upper inode on copy up is not an option, so the solution is to
> store those properties in an xattr.
>
> I think we should split the solution to the primary and secondary
> problems and avoid an over-designed generic future extendable
> xflags xattr feature.
>
> So I am leaning towards a more focused solution for
> IMMUTABLE/APPEND in the form of either two boolean
> xattr overlay.{immutable,appendonly} or one single bytes
> xattr overlay.protected.
Makes sense.
Not sure how you'd make it single byte and user friendly at the same
time. I.e. how'd you represent +ia?. Otherwise I'm fine with either.
Thanks,
Miklos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-11 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-06 14:46 [PATCH] ovl: consistent behavior for immutable/append-only inodes Amir Goldstein
2021-06-08 13:52 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-08 14:37 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-06-08 14:49 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-08 15:33 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-06-08 18:20 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-09 6:08 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-06-09 7:28 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-06-09 7:57 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-06-11 7:31 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-06-11 7:55 ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
2021-06-11 8:37 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-06-11 8:39 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJfpeguateThdqWPdF1P-OFuxYdrdgtz7dj-=ewBft-k2gDSdQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=cgxu519@mykernel.net \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).