From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A159C3A5A2 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 21:23:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87872089E for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 21:23:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388911AbfHWVXS (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Aug 2019 17:23:18 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:39612 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388270AbfHWVXS (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Aug 2019 17:23:18 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7E5B0B7; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 21:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1566595393.8347.56.camel@suse.com> Subject: Re: Lacie Rugged USB3-FW does not work with UAS From: Oliver Neukum To: Julian Sikorski , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 23:23:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <0eaecb64-4c67-110d-8493-31dd7fd58759@gmail.com> References: <1566567572.8347.54.camel@suse.com> <0eaecb64-4c67-110d-8493-31dd7fd58759@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-usb-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Am Freitag, den 23.08.2019, 16:21 +0200 schrieb Julian Sikorski: > > I did some further digging regarding whether this is a regression: the > quirk file on the laptop is from 15 July 2014. The machine is from ca. > May 2011. Looking through my earlier posts to linux-usb it appears that > the addition of the quirk is related to this thread: > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=140537519907935&w=2 > > At the same time, back in 2011, I reported that the drive was working > after some fixes: > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=132276407611433&w=2 Hi, this is alarming. Was this physically the same drive? I am asking because we have seen cases where two different devices were sold under the same name. Regards Oliver