From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
"# v4 . 8+" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] xhci: Fix false warning message about wrong bounce buffer write length
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 14:59:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1570190373-30684-2-git-send-email-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1570190373-30684-1-git-send-email-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
The check printing out the "WARN Wrong bounce buffer write length:"
uses incorrect values when comparing bytes written from scatterlist
to bounce buffer. Actual copied lengths are fine.
The used seg->bounce_len will be set to equal new_buf_len a few lines later
in the code, but is incorrect when doing the comparison.
The patch which added this false warning was backported to 4.8+ kernels
so this should be backported as far as well.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.8+
Fixes: 597c56e372da ("xhci: update bounce buffer with correct sg num")
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
index 9741cdeea9d7..85ceb43e3405 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
@@ -3202,10 +3202,10 @@ static int xhci_align_td(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct urb *urb, u32 enqd_len,
if (usb_urb_dir_out(urb)) {
len = sg_pcopy_to_buffer(urb->sg, urb->num_sgs,
seg->bounce_buf, new_buff_len, enqd_len);
- if (len != seg->bounce_len)
+ if (len != new_buff_len)
xhci_warn(xhci,
"WARN Wrong bounce buffer write length: %zu != %d\n",
- len, seg->bounce_len);
+ len, new_buff_len);
seg->bounce_dma = dma_map_single(dev, seg->bounce_buf,
max_pkt, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
} else {
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-04 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-04 11:59 [PATCH 0/8] xhci fixes for usb-linus Mathias Nyman
2019-10-04 11:59 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2019-10-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 2/8] xhci: Prevent device initiated U1/U2 link pm if exit latency is too long Mathias Nyman
2019-10-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 3/8] xhci: Check all endpoints for LPM timeout Mathias Nyman
2019-10-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 4/8] xhci: Fix USB 3.1 capability detection on early xHCI 1.1 spec based hosts Mathias Nyman
2019-10-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 5/8] usb: xhci: wait for CNR controller not ready bit in xhci resume Mathias Nyman
2019-10-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 6/8] xhci: Prevent deadlock when xhci adapter breaks during init Mathias Nyman
2019-10-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 7/8] xhci: Increase STS_SAVE timeout in xhci_suspend() Mathias Nyman
[not found] ` <20191006120750.5334F2087E@mail.kernel.org>
2019-10-07 18:51 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-10-04 11:59 ` [PATCH 8/8] xhci: Fix NULL pointer dereference in xhci_clear_tt_buffer_complete() Mathias Nyman
2019-10-07 14:02 ` Johan Hovold
2019-10-08 8:15 ` Mathias Nyman
2019-10-11 12:47 ` Mathias Nyman
2019-10-11 12:58 ` [RFT PATCH] xhci: Fix use-after-free regression in xhci clear hub TT implementation Mathias Nyman
2019-10-14 10:16 ` Johan Hovold
2019-10-14 13:18 ` Mathias Nyman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1570190373-30684-2-git-send-email-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).