linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>
To: Eli Billauer <eli.billauer@gmail.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	hdegoede@redhat.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: core: Solve race condition in usb_kill_anchored_urbs
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 15:58:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1595858285.13408.36.camel@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5F1EBA04.5050109@gmail.com>

Am Montag, den 27.07.2020, 14:27 +0300 schrieb Eli Billauer:
> Hello, Oliver.
> 
> On 27/07/20 13:14, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > That however is really a kludge we cannot have in usbcore.
> > I am afraid as is the patch should_not_  be applied.
> >    
> 
> Could you please explain further why the suggested patch is unsuitable?

Hi,

certainly.

1. timeouts are generally a bad idea, especially if the timeout does
not come out of a spec.

2. That involves quoting you:

Alternatively, if the driver submits URBs to the same anchor while 
usb_kill_anchored_urbs() is called, this timeout might be reached. This 
could happen, for example, if the completer function that ran in the 
racy situation resubmits the URB. If that situation isn't cleared within 
1000ms, it means that there's a URB in the system that the driver isn't 
aware of. Maybe that situation is worth more than a WARN.

That is an entirely valid use case. And a bulk URB may take a potentially
unbounded time to complete.

My failure in this case is simply overengineering.
If this line:

        usb_unanchor_urb(urb);

In __usb_hcd_giveback_urb(struct urb *urb) weren't there, the issue
would not exist. I misdesigned the API in automatically unanchoring
a completing URB.
Simply removing it now is no longer possible, so we need to come up with
a more complex solution.

	Regards
		Oliver


  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-27 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-27  7:22 [PATCH] usb: core: Solve race condition in usb_kill_anchored_urbs eli.billauer
2020-07-27  9:21 ` Greg KH
2020-07-27 11:26   ` Eli Billauer
2020-07-27 10:14 ` Oliver Neukum
2020-07-27 11:27   ` Eli Billauer
2020-07-27 13:58     ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2020-07-27 14:43       ` Alan Stern
2020-07-27 21:29         ` Oliver Neukum
2020-07-28  9:47           ` Eli Billauer
2020-07-28 13:42             ` Alan Stern
2020-07-28  9:44         ` Oliver Neukum
2020-07-28 13:39           ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1595858285.13408.36.camel@suse.de \
    --to=oneukum@suse.de \
    --cc=eli.billauer@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).