From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56C5C433E7 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D339207FF for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:48:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603025335; bh=RpoHDjN72kLqkdSx0OOl2n8U6czI8kgVZ/OPcq2R9gE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=NHGI5nH+/pNpmOeT4vbcrGmdQFTzJ5G4Mf32bRpSf6+on99qCITLErY2QWG4EP2C7 gZZKGPBChGB6Sr2iTbVN682iYAAHcgBi11CaoChNEBtXJZMyI7GxtHIqM2q/nJLYeJ fZh3G9J4MR4ikVIBOReF2QNWwdyZQ1Fv0orz4OHI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726219AbgJRMsw (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2020 08:48:52 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48192 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725776AbgJRMsw (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2020 08:48:52 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C7D3207FF; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 12:48:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1603025330; bh=RpoHDjN72kLqkdSx0OOl2n8U6czI8kgVZ/OPcq2R9gE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tiJ6g17ZDLEF8XaN22RiogJJq1ZAS3ZC6aWudJqPLlZnGShq3YpLQeQBhRTXgxpYm LvSTds8zpWtrPtDa4F3SF6gQPymu9JDO4ieu83mJOzEgnbUdTvSfB3AC7p+sQaFVYJ eVtwIAsrNHaGh711+bZc64wVukmEeHJWPeKj0cGQ= Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 14:49:37 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: septs Cc: Johan Hovold , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, septs Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: serial: option: add Quectel EC200T module support Message-ID: <20201018124937.GA3133964@kroah.com> References: <20201018105111.8727-1-kernel@septs.pw> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201018105111.8727-1-kernel@septs.pw> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 06:51:11PM +0800, septs wrote: > Add usb product id of the Quectel EC200T module. > --- > drivers/usb/serial/option.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c > index 2a3bfd6f8..7e879233b 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c > @@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ static void option_instat_callback(struct urb *urb); > #define QUECTEL_PRODUCT_EP06 0x0306 > #define QUECTEL_PRODUCT_EM12 0x0512 > #define QUECTEL_PRODUCT_RM500Q 0x0800 > +#define QUECTEL_PRODUCT_EC200T 0x6026 > > #define CMOTECH_VENDOR_ID 0x16d8 > #define CMOTECH_PRODUCT_6001 0x6001 > @@ -1117,6 +1118,7 @@ static const struct usb_device_id option_ids[] = { > { USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(QUECTEL_VENDOR_ID, QUECTEL_PRODUCT_RM500Q, 0xff, 0, 0) }, > { USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(QUECTEL_VENDOR_ID, QUECTEL_PRODUCT_RM500Q, 0xff, 0xff, 0x10), > .driver_info = ZLP }, > + { USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(QUECTEL_VENDOR_ID, QUECTEL_PRODUCT_EC200T, 0xff, 0, 0) }, > > { USB_DEVICE(CMOTECH_VENDOR_ID, CMOTECH_PRODUCT_6001) }, > { USB_DEVICE(CMOTECH_VENDOR_ID, CMOTECH_PRODUCT_CMU_300) }, > -- > 2.25.1 > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - Your patch does not have a Signed-off-by: line. Please read the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches and resend it after adding that line. Note, the line needs to be in the body of the email, before the patch, not at the bottom of the patch or in the email signature. - It looks like you did not use your "real" name for the patch on either the Signed-off-by: line, or the From: line (both of which have to match). Please read the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for how to do this correctly. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot