Re: possible deadlock in open_rio

[Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>]

On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 4:39 PM Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2019, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 4:01 PM Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 7 Aug 2019, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 9:13 PM Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 1 Aug 2019, syzbot wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > syzbot found the following crash on:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > HEAD commit:    7f7867ff usb-fuzzer: main usb gadget fuzzer driver
> > > > > > git tree:       https://github.com/google/kasan.git usb-fuzzer
> > > > > > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=136b6aec600000
> > > > > > kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=792eb47789f57810
> > > > > > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7bbcbe9c9ff0cd49592a
> > > > > > compiler:       gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
> > > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+7bbcbe9c9ff0cd49592a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ======================================================
> > > > > > WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> > > > > > 5.3.0-rc2+ #23 Not tainted
> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Andrey:
> > > > >
> > > > > This should be completely reproducible, since it's a simple ABBA
> > > > > locking violation.  Maybe just introducing a time delay (to avoid races
> > > > > and give the open() call time to run) between the gadget creation and
> > > > > gadget removal would be enough to do it.
> > > >
> > > > I've tried some simple approaches to reproducing this, but failed.
> > > > Should this require two rio500 devices to trigger?
> > >
> > > No, one device should be enough.  Just plug it in and then try to open
> > > the character device file.
> >
> > OK, I've reproduced it, so I can test a patch manually. The reason
> > syzbot couldn't do that, is because it doesn't open character devices.
> > Right now the USB fuzzing instance only opens /dev/input*,
> > /dev/hidraw* and /dev/usb/hiddev* (only the devices that are created
> > by USB HID devices as I've been working on adding USB HID targeted
> > fuzzing support lately).
> >
> > I guess we should open /dev/chr/* as well. The problem is that there
> > 300+ devices there even without connecting USB devices and opening
> > them blindly probably won't work. Is there a way to know which
> > character devices are created by USB devices? Maybe they are exposed
> > over /sys/bus/usb or via some other way?
>
> I don't have any devices that use this API, so I can't be certain.
> However, I believe the devices do get registered under /sys/class/usb/.
> (Note that this directory doesn't exist when there aren't any USB class
> files.)
>
> In any case, the USB character device files all have their major
> numbers set to 180 (USB_MAJOR defined in include/linux/usb.h), so you
> can identify them that way.

This should work! I'll enable fuzzing of /dev/char/180:*, thanks!

>
> Alan Stern
>