From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F1FC28EB4 for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 15:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03690206BB for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2019 15:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com header.i=@broadcom.com header.b="AFDD/k2/" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729490AbfFFPhb (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2019 11:37:31 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f67.google.com ([209.85.166.67]:33473 "EHLO mail-io1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729358AbfFFPha (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2019 11:37:30 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f67.google.com with SMTP id u13so569697iop.0 for ; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 08:37:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:thread-index:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7FsPigjoq8C26eFiFz4PbLbviE4sOu/NaNL8Wv/dWZY=; b=AFDD/k2/le52Hdd/TKthmiFLkpxwsE8wgwm+ToBDcTp5nk5LpKOXg2c5jC8eyqSr8U PbQa5dsh5SDeL6j0empaIJIbULAJcPWpVBbqfwPg+RIvS/9Z4t7qTgc+J2TnzpXamk2f Jk2clgGQMDirG2oKq3gaszEI2ZXgq2nzh2D7A= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7FsPigjoq8C26eFiFz4PbLbviE4sOu/NaNL8Wv/dWZY=; b=bG0qeJXqnwl7hCIMf9BLhAlUTQIOyU8JhCnSXMbeTtlORFVDSFDxmrIM5dhYMJCXdh 8Dcarwe5TU5o7FS3nIFSo7VLQFb4I5TzwC83DgjNgO9Ia2DQIqWK/WQZBu+E8+aIpnhL hiY8QjHz/27PFwdDiMJFBaIQX0jMYP7hG+RkJG0S5f6EPNjyH5wA1rI7rKGgZM7C3V6j 1iSA6mpeso35I+M5iF+dEIfznvCINsWAJy0JsVtbYjW9rGwH2qklJm1vL5aeqZ4zCPfJ dvIU/ZI9BLyl+sc39Etb6ylBNexVRXAzAqiIWFT911xIO2mx6BCHYRBbCAaLesolmq+t MWng== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVusyKq/4EA2+7PuseK8wtJj2icq0WSwZpHH5+MYFDLNFQ/K2N7 HVe7mvoaNqG4z9bQy9tmyRah/9UOutMZUGzU313Fpb4Jt+h/3Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxuIiFVwwy3SZOPoMV5d6L9mjSBqLBwyeJYTl2PURpa5yAIPkIYD/4gZiMQyRghGYi7pdemfpa8qFQTyevPY6Q= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9502:: with SMTP id d2mr14353761iom.2.1559835449946; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 08:37:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Kashyap Desai References: <20190605190836.32354-1-hch@lst.de> <20190605190836.32354-11-hch@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20190605190836.32354-11-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQNLjZIO2zMn7N+9xPobnDbFSu4o5gI2RJdJo5AtPRA= Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 21:07:27 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: RE: [PATCH 10/13] megaraid_sas: set virt_boundary_mask in the scsi host To: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe Cc: Sebastian Ott , Sagi Grimberg , Max Gurtovoy , Bart Van Assche , Ulf Hansson , Alan Stern , Oliver Neukum , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "PDL,MEGARAIDLINUX" , PDL-MPT-FUSIONLINUX , linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-usb-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org > > This ensures all proper DMA layer handling is taken care of by the SCSI > midlayer. Note that the effect is global, as the IOMMU merging is based > off a > paramters in struct device. We could still turn if off if no PCIe devices > are > present, but I don't know how to find that out. > > Also remove the bogus nomerges flag, merges do take the virt_boundary into > account. Hi Christoph, Changes for and looks good. We want to confirm few sanity before ACK. BTW, what benefit we will see moving virt_boundry setting to SCSI mid layer ? Is it just modular approach OR any functional fix ? Kashyap