From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2061CC433E1 for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 12:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CDE207C3 for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 12:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="JqXkjdW/" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390595AbgEYM7t (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2020 08:59:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60554 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390619AbgEYM7s (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2020 08:59:48 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x144.google.com (mail-lf1-x144.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::144]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62D92C08C5C2 for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 05:59:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x144.google.com with SMTP id c12so10456679lfc.10 for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 05:59:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EXtqB8Wun/tgjNkBpbPrNbEYBqWbgFsLrLS2OmL1m/M=; b=JqXkjdW/TwAhV/+ZstLcQDiGkcnh2vaThxK4UuXw1ZT4EbewRbqEMxF8cLo9srENSG y2bzMe8eVT4GRDrV5lIfGsLezcWERXdbNA0we0XcZSk7s/wgI/0Bg36o+Q5s+WrQwFnR 9Ezeei8Zk5ZuBxczU7luJMzFJL4NWTdRSEvpgnxSVbeH3cK/DSXlN9Tdbn/KKHl0ElRF 1c79At+nt2Qv3ftKSagmriY4yHRJuT3SfL5MLqCGu+N67fiYVIz6F+xk123QNykV4Ed1 Wi4Uy6bedneHNi7QQrkTEzS6GmgrbN7iai2K6CwtEDX6745b9xMfceJdYvhJEE/s2F96 nJvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EXtqB8Wun/tgjNkBpbPrNbEYBqWbgFsLrLS2OmL1m/M=; b=lEaEgbsDqYbbHZ2prpzjKKiE7SR2y9WODmcRavwR5h2GaEbyzx5TBbmJQoWpXjhpRo DrgnUjkVjgGVfgbihRIpmM1RovNehwxcxOIOWAmHp8QVY1xoIsibiKkW1s5N1AHR4hxv Nx6XjFLAhtxmIFYURiO84Rng11j9LmrsBruey+NG3cPO5AJR0JbEpfbxS7Wwr7Rkjnt4 9kh84vJFL/K6Wy/WrIB6vvsyQYfGydnMh1/GuNJWICL1jBopqSQlatWCw6Qy95Itscwk 0ai7mdVBQSOAmnnznk3DY9UAg6j1Sn7RM/LpBTWKCQqXzUUaxsO7bMeRJCDVa1howcrp z94A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533vAyEIPqA4naY0aN2vp6vcpyQ4V/ZT3oRHKeXDnXsTdXRpaNf4 p/C/T6I/IBvmsqgLvFxvh+Ah0YgMIqHYHmY6UxlxJA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxD2+KgVOK9WTwoquq8HqW2c21+zgJ2wXOdh5XtNRaWnyUiVdw++6s8JUaftb7+v3ytf4RuSWtwx/6fIhWUhyk= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5a07:: with SMTP id q7mr14490822lfn.77.1590411586745; Mon, 25 May 2020 05:59:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200423174543.17161-1-michael@walle.cc> <20200423174543.17161-11-michael@walle.cc> <75bff2917be1badd36af9f980cf59d2c@walle.cc> <951244aab2ff553a463f7431ba09bf27@walle.cc> In-Reply-To: <951244aab2ff553a463f7431ba09bf27@walle.cc> From: Linus Walleij Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 14:59:36 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/16] gpio: add a reusable generic gpio_chip using regmap To: Michael Walle Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Andy Shevchenko , linux-gpio , linux-devicetree , LKML , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, LINUXWATCHDOG , arm-soc , Rob Herring , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , Lee Jones , Thierry Reding , =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine=2DK=C3=B6nig?= , Wim Van Sebroeck , Shawn Guo , Li Yang , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier , Mark Brown , Greg Kroah-Hartman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 12:20 PM Michael Walle wrote: > If you like I could submit this patch on its own. But then there > wouldn't be a user for it. I'm pretty much fine with that, we do merge code that has no users if we anticipate they will be around the corner. Yours, Linus Walleij