linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@marvell.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com>,
	Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@marvell.com>,
	Xinming Hu <huxinming820@gmail.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] [4.20 PATCH] Revert "mwifiex: restructure rx_reorder_tbl_lock usage"
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:27:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181201022710.GA237752@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2cbb1f04ef8545ad9eaf3d7551a5dc03@SC-EXCH02.marvell.com>

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:04:49PM +0000, Ganapathi Bhat wrote:
> > This was clearly not tested well at all. I simply performed 'wget' in a loop and
> > it fell over within a few seconds.
> Sorry. I had run a iperf test before sharing the patch (no regression observed).
> It looks I failed to get this right for second time I will check this.

Were you running on an 11n/ac network? IIUC, the particular code that's
being blamed is only active with 11n+ features.

You might also make sure you test with stuff like lockdep enabled, as
that gives nice warnings and can even preemptively warn about potential
problems before they even occur, if you use the right settings. (Some
lockdep configurations can slow things down significantly, BTW.)

Brian

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-01  2:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-30 17:59 [4.20 PATCH] Revert "mwifiex: restructure rx_reorder_tbl_lock usage" Brian Norris
2018-11-30 19:04 ` [EXT] " Ganapathi Bhat
2018-12-01  2:27   ` Brian Norris [this message]
2018-12-03 12:37 ` Kalle Valo
2018-12-13 13:54 ` Kalle Valo
2019-03-08  2:34 ` Brian Norris
2019-06-04  3:03   ` [EXT] " Ganapathi Bhat
2019-06-04 20:57     ` Brian Norris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181201022710.GA237752@google.com \
    --to=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=amitkarwar@gmail.com \
    --cc=gbhat@marvell.com \
    --cc=huxinming820@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nishants@marvell.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).