linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Alexander Wetzel <alexander@wetzel-home.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 08/12] iwlwifi: dvm - EXT_KEY_ID A-MPDU API update
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 22:20:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a0b0cb563f511be74ccb9a7e491847c87aacc2b.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4bd73bd3-9027-4689-54e7-7c082eefa327@wetzel-home.de>

On Fri, 2019-02-22 at 22:15 +0100, Alexander Wetzel wrote:

> I hoped that the HW would already enforce the key border. 

I don't think so.

> But ok: The 
> cards will still be able to use NATIVE mode. Only now the driver will 
> have to request to disable Tx aggregation when finding a key border. 

It doesn't really have to even completely disable it, it'd just have to
send and LQ_CMD with agg_params.agg_frame_cnt_limit = 1, temporarily,
until the relevant frames were transmitted (this is a global config, so
it'd have to track the key border on each TID, but that's not _too_
hard).

> Since Tx aggregation is disabled per default anyhow many users will not 
> even see a difference.

Good point, I forgot all about that.

> (Off topic here, but I suspect the not reproducible problems leading to 
> change the Tx aggregation default to off could also have been ptk0 rekey 
> freezes. In that case we could now allow it again. But I've not found 
> raw error reports and guess it's not worth the efforts/risks to change 
> the default again.)

I wouldn't be so sure - PTK rekeying should still be a pretty uncommon
configuration. But I also don't recall the exact decision making going
into this.

johannes


  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-22 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-10 21:06 [RFC PATCH v3 00/12] Draft for Extended Key ID support Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-10 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/12] mac80211: Optimize tailroom_needed update checks Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-10 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/12] nl80211/cfg80211: Extended Key ID support Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-15 10:52   ` Johannes Berg
2019-02-17 19:19     ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-22  8:30       ` Johannes Berg
2019-02-22 23:04         ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-10 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/12] mac80211: IEEE 802.11 " Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-15 11:06   ` Johannes Berg
2019-02-19 20:58     ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-21 19:47       ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-22  8:41         ` Johannes Berg
2019-02-23 21:02           ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-03-01 20:43           ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-23 17:26         ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-10 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/12] mac80211: Compatibility " Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-15 11:09   ` Johannes Berg
2019-02-21 20:07     ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-22  8:53       ` Johannes Berg
2019-02-23 22:50         ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-10 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/12] mac80211: Mark A-MPDU keyid borders for drivers Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-15 11:50   ` Johannes Berg
2019-02-21 21:20     ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-22  8:51       ` Johannes Berg
2019-02-23 21:47         ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-10 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/12] mac80211_hwsim: Ext Key ID support (NATIVE) Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-10 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/12] iwlwifi: Extended " Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-15 11:52   ` Johannes Berg
2019-02-22 20:50     ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-22 21:06       ` Johannes Berg
2019-02-24 13:04         ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-04-08 20:10           ` Johannes Berg
2019-04-10 20:46             ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-04-12  9:51               ` Johannes Berg
2019-04-14 16:12                 ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-04-15  8:44                   ` Johannes Berg
2019-04-15 20:09                     ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-04-16  9:31                       ` Johannes Berg
2019-04-16 18:28                         ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-04-16 19:11                           ` Johannes Berg
2019-04-16 21:32                             ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-04-12 11:19               ` Johannes Berg
2019-02-10 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/12] iwlwifi: dvm - EXT_KEY_ID A-MPDU API update Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-15 11:54   ` Johannes Berg
2019-02-22 21:15     ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-22 21:20       ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2019-02-10 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/12] ath: Basic Extended Key ID support (COMPAT+NATIVE) Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-13 11:05   ` Kalle Valo
2019-02-13 23:15     ` Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-10 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/12] ath5k: ath_key_config() API compatibility update Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-10 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/12] ath9k: Extended Key ID support (COMPAT) Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-10 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/12] ath9k: EXT_KEY_ID A-MPDU API update Alexander Wetzel
2019-02-15 11:10 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/12] Draft for Extended Key ID support Johannes Berg
2019-02-21 20:44   ` Alexander Wetzel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8a0b0cb563f511be74ccb9a7e491847c87aacc2b.camel@sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=alexander@wetzel-home.de \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).