linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com>,
	Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@marvell.com>,
	Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@marvell.com>,
	Xinming Hu <huxinming820@gmail.com>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Revert "mwifiex: fix system hang problem after resume"
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 19:02:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+ASDXPCxDQAFPcPu5N6aY9mRDRF2FmsSTWAdgvSNDa2uPsRtQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875znfhv2b.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 6:55 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> writes:
>
> > + Doug, Matthias, who are seeing problems (or, failure to try to
> > recover, as predicted below)
> > + Amit's new email
> > + new maintainers
> >
> > Perhaps it's my fault for marking this RFC. But I changed the status
> > back to "New" in Patchwork, in case that helps:
>
> But I still see it marked as RFC. So the patch in question is:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9657277/

Oops, I didn't hit the "Update" button :(

I changed it now, but I'll change it back again.

> Changing the patchwork state to RFC means that it's dropped and out of
> my radar. Also, if I see "RFC" in the subject I assume that's a patch
> which I should not apply by default.

Ack. Well, there were some "RFCs" I sent recently that you *did*
apply, so I didn't really know what happens normally.

> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:21:36PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
...
> > FWIW, I got an Acked-by from Amit when he was still at Marvell. And
> > another Reviewed-by from Dmitry. This still applies. Should I resend?
> > (I'll do that if I don't hear a response within a few days.)
>
> This patch is from 2017 so better to resend, and without RFC markings.

Yep, will do.

Brian

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-03  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-31 20:21 [RFC PATCH] Revert "mwifiex: fix system hang problem after resume" Brian Norris
2017-04-01 16:20 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-04-06  4:32 ` amit karwar
2019-08-03  1:06 ` Brian Norris
2019-08-03  1:55   ` Kalle Valo
2019-08-03  2:02     ` Brian Norris [this message]
2019-08-03  2:08       ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+ASDXPCxDQAFPcPu5N6aY9mRDRF2FmsSTWAdgvSNDa2uPsRtQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=amitkarwar@gmail.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=gbhat@marvell.com \
    --cc=huxinming820@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=nishants@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).