From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C50EC433E6 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDDD2343E for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:55:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727626AbhAVMyi (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 07:54:38 -0500 Received: from paleale.coelho.fi ([176.9.41.70]:41636 "EHLO farmhouse.coelho.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727476AbhAVMyF (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 07:54:05 -0500 Received: from 91-156-6-193.elisa-laajakaista.fi ([91.156.6.193] helo=redipa.ger.corp.intel.com) by farmhouse.coelho.fi with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1l2vvh-003vnH-A1; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 14:52:45 +0200 From: Luca Coelho To: kvalo@codeaurora.org Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 14:52:37 +0200 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20210122125242.107146-1-luca@coelho.fi> References: <20210122125242.107146-1-luca@coelho.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [PATCH for v5.11 2/7] iwlwifi: mvm: invalidate IDs of internal stations at mvm start Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: Gregory Greenman Having sta_id not set for aux_sta and snif_sta can potentially lead to a hard to debug issue in case remove station is called without an add. In this case sta_id 0, an unrelated regular station, will be removed. In fact, we do have a FW assert that occures rarely and from the debug data analysis it looks like sta_id 0 is removed by mistake, though it's hard to pinpoint the exact flow. The WARN_ON in this patch should help to find it. Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho --- drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/ops.c | 4 ++++ drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/ops.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/ops.c index 98f62d78cf9c..03b41d911338 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/ops.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/ops.c @@ -791,6 +791,10 @@ iwl_op_mode_mvm_start(struct iwl_trans *trans, const struct iwl_cfg *cfg, if (!mvm->scan_cmd) goto out_free; + /* invalidate ids to prevent accidental removal of sta_id 0 */ + mvm->aux_sta.sta_id = IWL_MVM_INVALID_STA; + mvm->snif_sta.sta_id = IWL_MVM_INVALID_STA; + /* Set EBS as successful as long as not stated otherwise by the FW. */ mvm->last_ebs_successful = true; diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c index dc174410bf9c..578c353ae02c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c @@ -2057,6 +2057,9 @@ int iwl_mvm_rm_snif_sta(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct ieee80211_vif *vif) lockdep_assert_held(&mvm->mutex); + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(mvm->snif_sta.sta_id == IWL_MVM_INVALID_STA)) + return -EINVAL; + iwl_mvm_disable_txq(mvm, NULL, mvm->snif_queue, IWL_MAX_TID_COUNT, 0); ret = iwl_mvm_rm_sta_common(mvm, mvm->snif_sta.sta_id); if (ret) @@ -2071,6 +2074,9 @@ int iwl_mvm_rm_aux_sta(struct iwl_mvm *mvm) lockdep_assert_held(&mvm->mutex); + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(mvm->aux_sta.sta_id == IWL_MVM_INVALID_STA)) + return -EINVAL; + iwl_mvm_disable_txq(mvm, NULL, mvm->aux_queue, IWL_MAX_TID_COUNT, 0); ret = iwl_mvm_rm_sta_common(mvm, mvm->aux_sta.sta_id); if (ret) -- 2.29.2