From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@redhat.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Bill O'Donnell <bodonnel@redhat.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: dax: facilitate EXPERIMENTAL warning for dax=inode case
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 10:35:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0db1a400-8e01-2062-c49c-9538b5685dbb@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210827142509.bjovj2l75xjoqd6w@redhat.com>
On 8/27/21 9:25 AM, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 09:18:32AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 8/27/21 9:03 AM, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 06:43:44PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>> On 8/26/21 5:08 PM, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 01:16:22PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/26/21 1:09 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 12:30:12PM -0500, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @@ -1584,7 +1586,7 @@ xfs_fs_fill_super(
>>>>>>>> if (xfs_has_crc(mp))
>>>>>>>> sb->s_flags |= SB_I_VERSION;
>>>>>>>> - if (xfs_has_dax_always(mp)) {
>>>>>>>> + if (xfs_has_dax_always(mp) || xfs_has_dax_inode(mp)) {
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Er... can't this be done without burning another feature bit by:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if (xfs_has_dax_always(mp) || (!xfs_has_dax_always(mp) &&
>>>>>>> !xfs_has_dax_never(mp))) {
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> xfs_warn(mp, "DAX IS EXPERIMENTAL");
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> changing this conditional in this way will also fail dax=inode mounts on
>>>>>> reflink-capable (i.e. default) filesystems, no?
>>>>>
>>>>> Correct. My original patch tests fine, and still handles the reflink and dax
>>>>> incompatibility. The new suggested logic is problematic.
>>>>> -Bill
>>>>
>>>> I think that both your proposed patch and Darrick's suggestion have this problem.
>>>>
>>>> "mount -o dax=inode" makes your new xfs_has_dax_inode(mp) true, and in that
>>>> conditional, if the filesystem has reflink enabled, mount fails:
>>>>
>>>> # mkfs.xfs -f /dev/pmem0p1
>>>> meta-data=/dev/pmem0p1 isize=512 agcount=4, agsize=4194304 blks
>>>> = sectsz=4096 attr=2, projid32bit=1
>>>> = crc=1 finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=0
>>>> = reflink=1 bigtime=0 inobtcount=0
>>>> data = bsize=4096 blocks=16777216, imaxpct=25
>>>> = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
>>>> naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0, ftype=1
>>>> log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=8192, version=2
>>>> = sectsz=4096 sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=1
>>>> realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
>>>>
>>>> # mount -o dax=inode /dev/pmem0p1 /mnt/test
>>>> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/pmem0p1,
>>>> missing codepage or helper program, or other error
>>>>
>>>> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
>>>> dmesg | tail or so.
>>>>
>>>> # dmesg | tail -n 2
>>>> [ 192.691733] XFS (pmem0p1): DAX enabled. Warning: EXPERIMENTAL, use at your own risk
>>>> [ 192.700300] XFS (pmem0p1): DAX and reflink cannot be used together!
>>>>
>>>
>>> So, the "DAX enabled" is a misnomer in this case. However the incompatibility of DAX and reflink is
>>> reflected in the next message, and indeed the mount fails. Is it now a matter of fixing
>>> the message output so as not to indicate "DAX enabled..."?
>>
>> The mount should not fail, and it does not fail prior to your change.
>>
>> In the past, we did not allow any mixing of a reflink-capable
>> filesystem with dax in any way. Now, with per-inode dax, dax-enabled inodes and
>> reflink-enabled inodes can exist on the same filesystem, you just cannot have an
>> inode which is both dax-enabled and reflinked at the same time.
>
> Ah. I missed that nuance. I had thought the incompatibility was
> absolute. :/
>
> The manpage for mkfs.xfs may need updating for the inode mode
> (unless mine is old):
> ----------------snip------------------
> "Note: the filesystem DAX mount option ( -o dax ) is incom‐
> patible with reflink-enabled XFS filesystems. To use
> filesystem DAX with XFS, specify the -m reflink=0 option to
> mkfs.xfs to disable the reflink feature."
> -------------------------------------
Hm, looks like the xfs(5) manpage got updated, but it seems mkfs.xfs(8) did not.
dax=value
Set CPU direct access (DAX) behavior for the current filesystem.
This mount option accepts the following values:
"dax=inode" DAX will be enabled only on regular files with
FS_XFLAG_DAX applied.
"dax=never" DAX will not be enabled for any files. FS_XFLAG_DAX
will be ignored.
"dax=always" DAX will be enabled for all regular files, regardless
of the FS_XFLAG_DAX state.
If no option is used when mounting a filesystem stored on a DAX
capable device, dax=inode will be used as default.
For details regarding DAX behavior in kernel, please refer to ker‐
nel's documentation
I'll send a patch to fix up the mkfs manpage, thanks.
Thanks,
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-27 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-26 17:30 [PATCH] xfs: dax: facilitate EXPERIMENTAL warning for dax=inode case Bill O'Donnell
2021-08-26 18:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-26 18:14 ` Bill O'Donnell
2021-08-26 18:16 ` Eric Sandeen
2021-08-26 22:08 ` Bill O'Donnell
2021-08-26 23:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2021-08-27 14:03 ` Bill O'Donnell
2021-08-27 14:18 ` Eric Sandeen
2021-08-27 14:25 ` Bill O'Donnell
2021-08-27 15:35 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2021-08-27 15:41 ` Bill O'Donnell
2021-08-30 15:55 ` Bill O'Donnell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0db1a400-8e01-2062-c49c-9538b5685dbb@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=billodo@redhat.com \
--cc=bodonnel@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).