From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: sandeen@sandeen.net, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, alex@zadara.com
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] xfs_repair: check plausibility of root dir pointer before trashing it
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 17:21:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <157784167320.1371066.16235730726128503766.stgit@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157784164200.1371066.15490825981810186191.stgit@magnolia>
From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
If sb_rootino doesn't point to where we think mkfs should have allocated
the root directory, check to see if the alleged root directory actually
looks like a root directory. If so, we'll let it live because someone
could have changed sunit since formatting time, and that changes the
root directory inode estimate.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
---
repair/xfs_repair.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
diff --git a/repair/xfs_repair.c b/repair/xfs_repair.c
index 53b04dae..372616c4 100644
--- a/repair/xfs_repair.c
+++ b/repair/xfs_repair.c
@@ -426,6 +426,37 @@ _("would reset superblock %s inode pointer to %"PRIu64"\n"),
*ino = expected_ino;
}
+/* Does the root directory inode look like a plausible root directory? */
+static bool
+has_plausible_rootdir(
+ struct xfs_mount *mp)
+{
+ struct xfs_inode *ip;
+ xfs_ino_t ino;
+ int error;
+ bool ret = false;
+
+ error = -libxfs_iget(mp, NULL, mp->m_sb.sb_rootino, 0, &ip,
+ &xfs_default_ifork_ops);
+ if (error)
+ goto out;
+ if (!S_ISDIR(VFS_I(ip)->i_mode))
+ goto out_rele;
+
+ error = -libxfs_dir_lookup(NULL, ip, &xfs_name_dotdot, &ino, NULL);
+ if (error)
+ goto out_rele;
+
+ /* The root directory '..' entry points to the directory. */
+ if (ino == mp->m_sb.sb_rootino)
+ ret = true;
+
+out_rele:
+ libxfs_irele(ip);
+out:
+ return ret;
+}
+
/*
* Make sure that the first 3 inodes in the filesystem are the root directory,
* the realtime bitmap, and the realtime summary, in that order.
@@ -438,6 +469,20 @@ calc_mkfs(
rootino = libxfs_ialloc_calc_rootino(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_unit);
+ /*
+ * If the root inode isn't where we think it is, check its plausibility
+ * as a root directory. It's possible that somebody changed sunit
+ * since the filesystem was created, which can change the value of the
+ * above computation. Don't blow up the root directory if this is the
+ * case.
+ */
+ if (mp->m_sb.sb_rootino != rootino && has_plausible_rootdir(mp)) {
+ do_warn(
+_("sb root inode value %" PRIu64 " inconsistent with alignment (expected %"PRIu64")\n"),
+ mp->m_sb.sb_rootino, rootino);
+ rootino = mp->m_sb.sb_rootino;
+ }
+
ensure_fixed_ino(&mp->m_sb.sb_rootino, rootino,
_("root"));
ensure_fixed_ino(&mp->m_sb.sb_rbmino, rootino + 1,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-01 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-01 1:20 [PATCH v2 0/6] xfs_repair: do not trash valid root dirs Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01 1:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] mkfs: check root inode location Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01 1:20 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs_repair: enforce that inode btree chunks can't point to AG headers Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01 1:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs_repair: refactor fixed inode location checks Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01 1:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs_repair: use libxfs function to calculate root inode location Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-01 1:21 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-01-01 1:21 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs_repair: try to correct sb_unit value from secondaries Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24 0:17 [PATCH v3 0/6] xfs_repair: do not trash valid root dirs Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-24 0:17 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs_repair: check plausibility of root dir pointer before trashing it Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-30 20:18 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-01-30 20:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-30 20:41 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-01-30 20:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=157784167320.1371066.16235730726128503766.stgit@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=alex@zadara.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).