From: Matthew Bobrowski <mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
darrick.wong@oracle.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v3] iomap: Waiting for IO in iomap_dio_rw()
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:52:18 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191014085218.GA6102@athena.bobrowski.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191014082418.13885-1-jack@suse.cz>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:26:01AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Original motivation:
>
> when doing the ext4 conversion of direct IO code to iomap, we found it very
> difficult to handle inode extension with what iomap code currently provides.
> Ext4 wants to do inode extension as sync IO (so that the whole duration of
> IO is protected by inode->i_rwsem), also we need to truncate blocks beyond
> end of file in case of error or short write. Now in ->end_io handler we don't
> have the information how long originally the write was (to judge whether we
> may have allocated more blocks than we actually used) and in ->write_iter
> we don't know whether / how much of the IO actually succeeded in case of AIO.
>
> Thinking about it for some time I think iomap code makes it unnecessarily
> complex for the filesystem in case it decides it doesn't want to perform AIO
> and wants to fall back to good old synchronous IO. In such case it is much
> easier for the filesystem if it just gets normal error return from
> iomap_dio_rw() and not just -EIOCBQUEUED.
>
> The first patch in the series adds argument to iomap_dio_rw() to wait for IO
> completion (internally iomap_dio_rw() already supports this!) and the second
> patch converts XFS waiting for unaligned DIO write to this new API.
Ah, wonderful, I was waiting for this to come through.
I'll rebase my EXT4 direct I/O port on top of these patches and apply
the discussed changes. Any objections? :)
--<M>--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-14 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-14 8:26 [PATCH 0/2 v3] iomap: Waiting for IO in iomap_dio_rw() Jan Kara
2019-10-14 8:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] iomap: Allow forcing of waiting for running DIO " Jan Kara
2019-10-14 8:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-14 8:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: Use iomap_dio_rw_wait() Jan Kara
2019-10-14 8:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-10-14 8:52 ` Matthew Bobrowski [this message]
2019-10-14 9:32 ` [PATCH 0/2 v3] iomap: Waiting for IO in iomap_dio_rw() Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191014085218.GA6102@athena.bobrowski.net \
--to=mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).