From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/12] fs/xfs: Check if the inode supports DAX under lock
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 08:10:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200212161041.GE20214@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200211204220.GN10776@dread.disaster.area>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 07:42:20AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 09:55:09AM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 05:16:39PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 11:34:39AM -0800, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
> > > > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> > > >
[snip]
> > >
> > > This raciness in checking the DAX flags is the reason that
> > > xfs_ioctl_setattr_xflags() redoes all the reflink vs dax checks once
> > > it's called under the XFS_ILOCK_EXCL during the actual change
> > > transaction....
> >
> > Ok I found this by trying to make sure that the xfs_inode_supports_dax() call
> > was always returning valid data. So I don't have a specific test which was
> > failing.
> >
> > Looking at the code again, it sounds like I was wrong about which locks protect
> > what and with your explanation above it looks like there is nothing to be done
> > here and I can drop the patch.
> >
> > Would you agree?
>
> *nod*
Thanks! done.
Ira
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-12 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-08 19:34 [PATCH v3 00/12] Enable per-file/directory DAX operations V3 ira.weiny
2020-02-08 19:34 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] fs/stat: Define DAX statx attribute ira.weiny
2020-02-08 19:34 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] fs/xfs: Isolate the physical DAX flag from effective ira.weiny
2020-02-08 19:34 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] fs/xfs: Separate functionality of xfs_inode_supports_dax() ira.weiny
2020-02-11 5:47 ` Dave Chinner
2020-02-11 16:13 ` Ira Weiny
2020-02-08 19:34 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] fs/xfs: Clean up DAX support check ira.weiny
2020-02-11 5:57 ` Dave Chinner
2020-02-11 16:28 ` Ira Weiny
2020-02-11 20:38 ` Dave Chinner
2020-02-08 19:34 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] fs: remove unneeded IS_DAX() check ira.weiny
2020-02-11 5:34 ` Dave Chinner
2020-02-11 16:38 ` Ira Weiny
2020-02-11 20:41 ` Dave Chinner
2020-02-12 16:04 ` Ira Weiny
2020-02-08 19:34 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] fs/xfs: Check if the inode supports DAX under lock ira.weiny
2020-02-11 6:16 ` Dave Chinner
2020-02-11 17:55 ` Ira Weiny
2020-02-11 20:42 ` Dave Chinner
2020-02-12 16:10 ` Ira Weiny [this message]
2020-02-08 19:34 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] fs: Add locking for a dynamic DAX state ira.weiny
2020-02-11 8:00 ` Dave Chinner
2020-02-11 20:14 ` Ira Weiny
2020-02-11 20:59 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-11 21:49 ` Dave Chinner
2020-02-12 6:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-08 19:34 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] fs/xfs: Clarify lockdep dependency for xfs_isilocked() ira.weiny
2020-02-08 19:34 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] fs/xfs: Add write DAX lock to xfs layer ira.weiny
2020-02-08 19:34 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] fs: Prevent DAX state change if file is mmap'ed ira.weiny
2020-02-08 19:34 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] fs/xfs: Clean up locking in dax invalidate ira.weiny
2020-02-08 19:34 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] fs/xfs: Allow toggle of effective DAX flag ira.weiny
2020-02-10 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] Enable per-file/directory DAX operations V3 Jeff Moyer
2020-02-11 20:17 ` Ira Weiny
2020-02-12 19:49 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-13 19:01 ` Ira Weiny
2020-02-13 19:05 ` Ira Weiny
2020-02-13 19:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-13 23:29 ` Ira Weiny
2020-02-14 0:16 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-14 20:06 ` Ira Weiny
2020-02-14 21:23 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-14 21:58 ` Ira Weiny
2020-02-14 22:06 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-14 22:58 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-14 23:03 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-18 2:35 ` Ira Weiny
2020-02-18 14:22 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-02-18 23:54 ` Ira Weiny
2020-02-20 16:20 ` Ira Weiny
2020-02-20 16:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-20 16:49 ` Ira Weiny
2020-02-20 17:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200212161041.GE20214@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com \
--to=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).