From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] repair: don't double check dir2 sf parent in phase 4
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 19:43:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200715184350.GB23618@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200715140836.10197-3-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:08:34AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> The shortform parent ino verification code runs once in phase 3
> (ino_discovery == true) and once in phase 4 (ino_discovery ==
> false). This is unnecessary and leads to duplicate error messages if
> repair replaces an invalid parent value with zero because zero is
> still an invalid value. Skip the check in phase 4.
This looks good,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
As far as the existing code is concerned: Does anyone else find the
ino_discovery booleand passed as int as annoying as I do? An
"enum repair_phase phase" would be much more descriptive in my opinion.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-15 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-15 14:08 [PATCH 0/4] xfsprogs: remove custom dir2 sf fork verifier from repair Brian Foster
2020-07-15 14:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] repair: set the in-core inode parent in phase 3 Brian Foster
2020-07-15 18:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-21 0:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-15 14:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] repair: don't double check dir2 sf parent in phase 4 Brian Foster
2020-07-15 18:43 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2020-07-15 23:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-16 10:39 ` Brian Foster
2020-07-21 0:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-15 14:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] repair: use fs root ino for dummy parent value instead of zero Brian Foster
2020-07-15 18:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-15 22:22 ` Dave Chinner
2020-07-16 10:41 ` Brian Foster
2020-07-16 22:06 ` Dave Chinner
2020-07-17 11:57 ` Brian Foster
2020-07-17 11:59 ` [PATCH v2] repair: use fs rootino " Brian Foster
2020-07-20 3:21 ` Dave Chinner
2020-07-21 0:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-07-15 14:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] repair: remove custom dir2 sf fork verifier from phase6 Brian Foster
2020-07-15 18:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-21 0:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200715184350.GB23618@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).