From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Abdul Haleem <abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] workqueue:Fix affinity of an unbound worker of a node with 1 online CPU
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:14:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160615131415.GI30909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160615125033.GB31671@in.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 06:20:33PM +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> We will no longer have the optimization in
> restore_unbound_workers_cpumask() but I suppose we don't lose much by
> resetting the affinity every time a CPU in the pool->attr->cpumask
> comes online.
Right; optimizing hotplug really isn't worth it. The code needs to be
simple and robust (ha! funny).
In any case, Tejun, does this work for you?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-15 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-19 10:57 WARNING at kernel/sched/core.c:1166 while booting 4.6.0 mainline on ppc64le bare metal abdhalee
2016-05-19 12:34 ` Gavin Shan
2016-05-26 15:11 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-06-07 12:29 ` Abdul Haleem
2016-06-07 15:14 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix CPU Online handling for unbounded worker threads Gautham R. Shenoy
2016-06-07 15:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Move wq_update_unbound_numa() to the beginning of CPU_ONLINE Gautham R. Shenoy
2016-06-15 15:53 ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-15 19:28 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-06-16 19:35 ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-21 14:12 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-06-21 15:36 ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-21 19:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-21 19:43 ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-21 19:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-22 5:15 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-06-07 15:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] workqueue:Fix affinity of an unbound worker of a node with 1 online CPU Gautham R. Shenoy
2016-06-08 6:03 ` Abdul Haleem
2016-06-14 11:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-15 10:19 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-06-15 11:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-15 12:50 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-06-15 13:14 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-06-15 16:01 ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-16 12:11 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-06-16 12:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-16 19:39 ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-17 1:49 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-07-15 5:27 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2016-07-15 5:30 ` Michael Ellerman
[not found] ` <57887507.911f240a.687de.08c5SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2016-07-15 12:10 ` Tejun Heo
2016-06-13 5:44 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix CPU Online handling for unbounded worker threads Gautham R Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160615131415.GI30909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=abdhalee@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).