linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	bsingharora@gmail.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 03/12] powerpc: Implement sys_pkey_alloc and sys_pkey_free system call.
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 15:45:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170620224544.GE17588@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874lvcuq6e.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:18:01PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Hi Ram,
> 
> Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> writes:
> > Sys_pkey_alloc() allocates and returns available pkey
> > Sys_pkey_free()  frees up the pkey.
> >
> > Total 32 keys are supported on powerpc. However pkey 0,1 and 31
> > are reserved. So effectively we have 29 pkeys.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/mm.h                           |  31 ++++---
> >  include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h       |   2 +-
> 
> Those changes need to be split out and acked by mm folks.
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> > index 7cb17c6..34ddac7 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> > @@ -204,26 +204,35 @@ extern int overcommit_kbytes_handler(struct ctl_table *, int, void __user *,
> >  #define VM_MERGEABLE	0x80000000	/* KSM may merge identical pages */
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USES_HIGH_VMA_FLAGS
> > -#define VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_0	32	/* bit only usable on 64-bit architectures */
> > -#define VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_1	33	/* bit only usable on 64-bit architectures */
> > -#define VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_2	34	/* bit only usable on 64-bit architectures */
> > -#define VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_3	35	/* bit only usable on 64-bit architectures */
> > +#define VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_0	32	/* bit only usable on 64-bit arch */
> > +#define VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_1	33	/* bit only usable on 64-bit arch */
> > +#define VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_2	34	/* bit only usable on 64-bit arch */
> > +#define VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_3	35	/* bit only usable on 64-bit arch */
> 
> Please don't change the comments, it makes the diff harder to read.

The lines were surpassing 80 columns. tried to compress the comments
without loosing meaning. will restore.

> 
> You're actually just adding this AFAICS:
> 
> > +#define VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_4	36	/* bit only usable on 64-bit arch */
> 
> >  #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_0	BIT(VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_0)
> >  #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_1	BIT(VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_1)
> >  #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_2	BIT(VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_2)
> >  #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_3	BIT(VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_3)
> > +#define VM_HIGH_ARCH_4	BIT(VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_4)
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_USES_HIGH_VMA_FLAGS */
> >  
> >  #if defined(CONFIG_X86)
>                ^
> >  # define VM_PAT		VM_ARCH_1	/* PAT reserves whole VMA at once (x86) */
> > -#if defined (CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS)
> > -# define VM_PKEY_SHIFT	VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_0
> > -# define VM_PKEY_BIT0	VM_HIGH_ARCH_0	/* A protection key is a 4-bit value */
> > -# define VM_PKEY_BIT1	VM_HIGH_ARCH_1
> > -# define VM_PKEY_BIT2	VM_HIGH_ARCH_2
> > -# define VM_PKEY_BIT3	VM_HIGH_ARCH_3
> > -#endif
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS) \
> > +	|| defined(CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS)
> > +#define VM_PKEY_SHIFT	VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_0
> > +#define VM_PKEY_BIT0	VM_HIGH_ARCH_0	/* A protection key is a 5-bit value */
>                                                                  ^ 4?
> > +#define VM_PKEY_BIT1	VM_HIGH_ARCH_1
> > +#define VM_PKEY_BIT2	VM_HIGH_ARCH_2
> > +#define VM_PKEY_BIT3	VM_HIGH_ARCH_3
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS */
> 
> That appears to be inside an #if defined(CONFIG_X86) ?
> 
> >  #elif defined(CONFIG_PPC)
>                  ^
> Should be CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS no?

Its a little garbled. Will fix it.
> 
> > +#define VM_PKEY_BIT0	VM_HIGH_ARCH_0	/* A protection key is a 5-bit value */
> > +#define VM_PKEY_BIT1	VM_HIGH_ARCH_1
> > +#define VM_PKEY_BIT2	VM_HIGH_ARCH_2
> > +#define VM_PKEY_BIT3	VM_HIGH_ARCH_3
> > +#define VM_PKEY_BIT4	VM_HIGH_ARCH_4  /* intel does not use this bit */
> > +					/* but reserved for future expansion */
> 
> But this hunk is for PPC ?
> 
> Is it OK for the other arches & generic code to add another VM_PKEY_BIT4 ?

No. it has to be PPC specific.

> 
> Do you need to update show_smap_vma_flags() ?
> 
> >  # define VM_SAO		VM_ARCH_1	/* Strong Access Ordering (powerpc) */
> >  #elif defined(CONFIG_PARISC)
> >  # define VM_GROWSUP	VM_ARCH_1
> 
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> > index 8c27db0..b13ecc6 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
> > @@ -76,5 +76,5 @@
> >  #define PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE	0x2
> >  #define PKEY_ACCESS_MASK	(PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS |\
> >  				 PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE)
> > -
> > +#define PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE	0x4
> 
> How you can set that if it's not in PKEY_ACCESS_MASK?

I was wondering how to handle this. x86 does not support this flag.
However powerpc has the ability to enable/disable execute permission
on a key. It cannot be done from userspace, but can be done through
the sys_mprotect_pkey() sys call. Initially I was thinking of not
enabling it in powerpc aswell, but than i think we should be not block
the hardware feature from being used.  I will make
PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE as part of the PKEY_ACCESS_MASK, and have powerpc
handle it. Also will x86 patch that return error if the flag is
provided.

makes sense?


Thanks for your comments,
RP

> 
> See:
> 
> SYSCALL_DEFINE2(pkey_alloc, unsigned long, flags, unsigned long, init_val)
> {
> 	int pkey;
> 	int ret;
> 
> 	/* No flags supported yet. */
> 	if (flags)
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 	/* check for unsupported init values */
> 	if (init_val & ~PKEY_ACCESS_MASK)
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 
> 
> cheers

-- 
Ram Pai

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-20 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-17  3:52 [RFC v2 00/12] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Ram Pai
2017-06-17  3:52 ` [RFC v2 01/12] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 4K backed hpte pages Ram Pai
2017-06-20 10:20   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-06-20 23:23     ` Ram Pai
2017-06-21  5:35       ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-06-21  6:34         ` Ram Pai
2017-06-21  6:41   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-06-21  9:30     ` Ram Pai
2017-06-22  9:07   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-06-22 16:20     ` Ram Pai
2017-06-17  3:52 ` [RFC v2 02/12] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 64K " Ram Pai
2017-06-20 10:51   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-06-20 23:25     ` Ram Pai
2017-06-21  6:50   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-06-21  6:54   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-06-21 20:14     ` Ram Pai
2017-06-17  3:52 ` [RFC v2 03/12] powerpc: Implement sys_pkey_alloc and sys_pkey_free system call Ram Pai
2017-06-19 12:18   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-06-20 22:45     ` Ram Pai [this message]
2017-06-17  3:52 ` [RFC v2 04/12] powerpc: store and restore the pkey state across context switches Ram Pai
2017-06-17  3:52 ` [RFC v2 05/12] powerpc: Implementation for sys_mprotect_pkey() system call Ram Pai
2017-06-21  7:16   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-06-17  3:52 ` [RFC v2 06/12] powerpc: Program HPTE key protection bits Ram Pai
2017-06-20  8:21   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-06-20 23:26     ` Ram Pai
2017-06-17  3:52 ` [RFC v2 07/12] powerpc: Macro the mask used for checking DSI exception Ram Pai
2017-06-20  8:14   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-06-20 23:28     ` Ram Pai
2017-06-21  7:25   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-06-21  9:17     ` Ram Pai
2017-06-17  3:52 ` [RFC v2 08/12] powerpc: Handle exceptions caused by violation of pkey protection Ram Pai
2017-06-20  7:24   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-06-20 23:43     ` Ram Pai
2017-06-21  3:54       ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-06-21  6:26         ` Ram Pai
2017-06-17  3:52 ` [RFC v2 09/12] powerpc: Deliver SEGV signal on pkey violation Ram Pai
2017-06-20  6:54   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-06-20 23:56     ` Ram Pai
2017-06-21  3:18       ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-06-21  6:10         ` Ram Pai
2017-06-17  3:52 ` [RFC v2 10/12] powerpc: Read AMR only if pkey-violation caused the exception Ram Pai
2017-06-19 11:06   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-06-19 17:59     ` Ram Pai
2017-06-20  6:46       ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-06-20 23:58         ` Ram Pai
2017-06-20 23:56     ` Ram Pai
2017-06-17  3:52 ` [RFC v2 11/12]Documentation: Documentation updates Ram Pai
2017-06-20  6:18   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-06-21  0:04     ` Ram Pai
2017-06-17  3:52 ` [RFC v2 12/12]selftest: Updated protection key selftest Ram Pai
2017-06-19 11:04   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-06-20  6:26   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-06-21  0:10     ` Ram Pai
2017-06-20  5:10 ` [RFC v2 00/12] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Balbir Singh
2017-06-20  6:05   ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-06-20  9:56   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170620224544.GE17588@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com \
    --to=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).