linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] perf/core: Generalise event exclusion checking
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 14:08:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181119130800.GE9761@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1542363853-13849-1-git-send-email-andrew.murray@arm.com>

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:24:03AM +0000, Andrew Murray wrote:
> Many PMU drivers do not have the capability to exclude counting events
> that occur in specific contexts such as idle, kernel, guest, etc. These
> drivers indicate this by returning an error in their event_init upon
> testing the events attribute flags.
> 
> However this approach requires that each time a new event modifier is
> added to perf, all the perf drivers need to be modified to indicate that
> they don't support the attribute. This results in additional boiler-plate
> code common to many drivers that needs to be maintained. An example of
> this is the addition of exclude_host and exclude_guest in 2011 yet many
> PMU drivers do not support this or indicate an error on events that make
> use of it.
> 
> This patch generalises the test for exclusion and updates PMU drivers to
> use it. This is a functional change as some PMU drivers will now correctly
> report that they don't support certain events whereas they previously did.

Right, I like that idea, and yes, there's a lot of fail around there :/

> A longer term approach may instead be for PMU's to advertise their
> capabilities on registration.

This I think is the better approach. We already have the
PERF_PMU_CAP_flags that can be used to advertise various PMU
capabilities.

Something along these lines I suppose; then every PMU that actually
checks the flags, needs to set the flag, otherwise it'll fail.

diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 53c500f0ca79..de15723ea52a 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ struct perf_event;
 #define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE			0x10
 #define PERF_PMU_CAP_ITRACE			0x20
 #define PERF_PMU_CAP_HETEROGENEOUS_CPUS		0x40
+#define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUDE			0x80
 
 /**
  * struct pmu - generic performance monitoring unit
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 84530ab358c3..d76b724177b9 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -9772,6 +9772,14 @@ static int perf_try_init_event(struct pmu *pmu, struct perf_event *event)
 	if (ctx)
 		perf_event_ctx_unlock(event->group_leader, ctx);
 
+	if (!ret) {
+		if ((pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUDE) ||
+		    event_has_exclude_flags(event)) {
+			event->destroy(event);
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if (ret)
 		module_put(pmu->module);
 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-19 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-16 10:24 [PATCH 00/10] perf/core: Generalise event exclusion checking Andrew Murray
2018-11-16 10:24 ` [PATCH 01/10] perf/core: Add macro to test for event exclusion flags Andrew Murray
2018-11-19 12:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-19 16:01   ` Mark Rutland
2018-11-20 11:28   ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-23 14:32     ` Andrew Murray
2018-11-16 10:24 ` [PATCH 02/10] arm: perf/core: generalise event exclusion checking with perf macro Andrew Murray
2018-11-16 10:24 ` [PATCH 03/10] arm: perf: add additional validation to set_event_filter Andrew Murray
2018-11-16 10:24 ` [PATCH 04/10] powerpc: perf/core: generalise event exclusion checking with perf macro Andrew Murray
2018-11-20 11:21   ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-16 10:24 ` [PATCH 05/10] powerpc/pmu/fsl: add additional validation to event_init Andrew Murray
2018-11-16 10:24 ` [PATCH 06/10] alpha: perf/core: generalise event exclusion checking with perf macro Andrew Murray
2018-11-16 10:24 ` [PATCH 07/10] x86: " Andrew Murray
2018-11-16 10:24 ` [PATCH 08/10] perf/core: Remove unused perf_flags Andrew Murray
2018-11-16 10:24 ` [PATCH 09/10] drivers/perf: perf/core: generalise event exclusion checking with perf macro Andrew Murray
2018-11-19 16:03   ` Mark Rutland
2018-11-23 14:31     ` Andrew Murray
2018-11-16 10:24 ` [PATCH 10/10] perf/doc: update design.txt for exclude_{host|guest} flags Andrew Murray
2018-11-20 11:31   ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-20 13:32     ` Andrew Murray
2018-12-11 11:06       ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-11 13:59         ` Andrew Murray
2018-12-12  4:48           ` Michael Ellerman
2018-12-12  8:07           ` Christoffer Dall
2018-12-12 17:08             ` Andrew Murray
2018-11-19 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-11-22 12:21   ` [PATCH 00/10] perf/core: Generalise event exclusion checking Andrew Murray
2018-11-22 12:26     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-22 12:59       ` Andrew Murray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181119130800.GE9761@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew.murray@arm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).