From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Powerpc: Better preemption for shared processor
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 12:44:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201029071420.GA528281@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da67d6ce-f120-f61a-19ff-0ae4f1f5dac0@redhat.com>
* Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> [2020-10-28 20:01:30]:
> > Srikar Dronamraju (4):
> > powerpc: Refactor is_kvm_guest declaration to new header
> > powerpc: Rename is_kvm_guest to check_kvm_guest
> > powerpc: Reintroduce is_kvm_guest
> > powerpc/paravirt: Use is_kvm_guest in vcpu_is_preempted
> >
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/firmware.h | 6 ------
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_guest.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_para.h | 2 +-
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/firmware.c | 5 ++++-
> > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c | 3 ++-
> > 6 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_guest.h
> >
> This patch series looks good to me and the performance is nice too.
>
> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Thank you.
>
> Just curious, is the performance mainly from the use of static_branch
> (patches 1 - 3) or from reducing call to yield_count_of().
Because of the reduced call to yield_count
>
> Cheers,
> Longman
>
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-29 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-28 12:35 [PATCH 0/4] Powerpc: Better preemption for shared processor Srikar Dronamraju
2020-10-28 12:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] powerpc: Refactor is_kvm_guest declaration to new header Srikar Dronamraju
2020-10-28 12:35 ` [PATCH 2/4] powerpc: Rename is_kvm_guest to check_kvm_guest Srikar Dronamraju
2020-10-28 12:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] powerpc: Reintroduce is_kvm_guest in a new avatar Srikar Dronamraju
2020-10-28 12:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/paravirt: Use is_kvm_guest in vcpu_is_preempted Srikar Dronamraju
2020-10-29 0:01 ` [PATCH 0/4] Powerpc: Better preemption for shared processor Waiman Long
2020-10-29 7:14 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201029071420.GA528281@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).