Re: [PATCH 1/1] powerpc/smp: Set numa node before updating mask

[Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

* Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com> [2021-04-01 17:51:05]:

Thanks Nathan for reviewing.

> > -	set_numa_node(numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu]);
> > -	set_numa_mem(local_memory_node(numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu]));
> > -
> 
> Regardless of your change: at boot time, this set of calls to
> set_numa_node() and set_numa_mem() is redundant, right? Because
> smp_prepare_cpus() has:
> 
> 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> 		...
> 		if (cpu_present(cpu)) {
> 			set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu]);
> 			set_cpu_numa_mem(cpu,
> 				local_memory_node(numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu]));
> 		}
> 
> I would rather that, when onlining a CPU that happens to have been
> dynamically added after boot, we enter start_secondary() with conditions
> equivalent to those at boot time. Or as close to that as is practical.
> 
> So I'd suggest that pseries_add_processor() be made to update
> these things when the CPUs are marked present, before onlining them.

In pseries_add_processor, we are only marking the cpu as present. i.e
I believe numa_setup_cpu() would not have been called. So we may not have a
way to associate the CPU to the node. Otherwise we will have to call
numa_setup_cpu() or the hcall_vphn.

We could try calling numa_setup_cpu() immediately after we set the
CPU to be present, but that would be one more extra hcall + I dont know if
there are any more steps needed before CPU being made present and
associating the CPU to the node. Are we sure the node is already online? For
the numa_mem, we are better of if the zonelists for the node are built.

or the other solution would be to call this in map_cpu_to_node().
Here also we have to be sure the zonelists for the node are already built.

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju