linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>,
	linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
	Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/18] powerpc/pseries: add of_node_put() in dlpar_detach_node()
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:09:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <780fb659-29e8-1ef4-4f62-97dacf36f6c8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181018170931.GC15557@bogus>

On 10/18/18 10:09, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 07:37:24PM -0700, frowand.list@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>>
>> "of: overlay: add missing of_node_get() in __of_attach_node_sysfs"
>> added a missing of_node_get() to __of_attach_node_sysfs().  This
>> results in a refcount imbalance for nodes attached with
>> dlpar_attach_node().  The calling sequence from dlpar_attach_node()
>> to __of_attach_node_sysfs() is:
>>
>>    dlpar_attach_node()
>>       of_attach_node()
>>          __of_attach_node_sysfs()
> 
> IIRC, there's a long standing item in the todo (Grant's) to convert the 
> open coded dlpar code. Maybe you want to do that first?

I'd like to avoid extra delays to getting the current (with necesary
fixes) series accepted because the series is rather intrusive and
could have conflicts with other patches.

I'm also worried that I don't have access to any of the systems that
use the dynamic overlay code, and I don't have any way to test the
changes.

Can we encourage the users of this code to convert the open coded
dlpar code?


>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>> ---
>>
>> ***** UNTESTED.  I need people with the affected PowerPC systems
>> *****            (systems that dynamically allocate and deallocate
>> *****            devicetree nodes) to test this patch.
> 
> Can't we write a test case that does the same thing?

I could write a simplistic test case, but I'm concerned that
simplistic is not anywhere near sufficient.  And my test case
would reflect the same assumptions I already have when I
wrote this patch.


>>
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c
>> index a0b20c03f078..e3010b14aea5 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c
>> @@ -272,6 +272,8 @@ int dlpar_detach_node(struct device_node *dn)
>>  	if (rc)
>>  		return rc;
>>  
>> +	of_node_put(dn);
>> +
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> -- 
>> Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-18 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-16  2:37 [PATCH v4 00/18] of: overlay: validation checks, subsequent fixes frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 01/18] of: overlay: add tests to validate kfrees from overlay removal frowand.list
2018-10-17 21:30   ` Alan Tull
2018-10-18 20:24     ` Alan Tull
2018-10-18 17:03   ` Rob Herring
2018-10-18 19:01     ` Frank Rowand
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 02/18] of: overlay: add missing of_node_put() after add new node to changeset frowand.list
2018-10-18 17:05   ` Rob Herring
2018-10-18 19:02     ` Frank Rowand
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 03/18] of: overlay: add missing of_node_get() in __of_attach_node_sysfs frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 04/18] powerpc/pseries: add of_node_put() in dlpar_detach_node() frowand.list
2018-10-18 17:09   ` Rob Herring
2018-10-18 19:09     ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2018-10-19 16:10       ` Rob Herring
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 05/18] of: overlay: use prop add changeset entry for property in new nodes frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 06/18] of: overlay: do not duplicate properties from overlay for " frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 07/18] of: dynamic: change type of of_{at, de}tach_node() to void frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 08/18] of: overlay: reorder fields in struct fragment frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 09/18] of: overlay: validate overlay properties #address-cells and #size-cells frowand.list
2018-10-18 18:13   ` Rob Herring
2018-10-18 19:13     ` Frank Rowand
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 10/18] of: overlay: make all pr_debug() and pr_err() messages unique frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 11/18] of: overlay: test case of two fragments adding same node frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 12/18] of: overlay: check prevents multiple fragments add or delete " frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 13/18] of: overlay: check prevents multiple fragments touching same property frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 14/18] of: unittest: remove unused of_unittest_apply_overlay() argument frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 15/18] of: overlay: set node fields from properties when add new overlay node frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 16/18] of: unittest: allow base devicetree to have symbol metadata frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 17/18] of: unittest: find overlays[] entry by name instead of index frowand.list
2018-10-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v4 18/18] of: unittest: initialize args before calling of_*parse_*() frowand.list
2018-10-16  9:47 ` [PATCH v4 00/18] of: overlay: validation checks, subsequent fixes Michael Ellerman
2018-10-17  3:08   ` Frank Rowand
2018-10-17 21:16     ` Alan Tull

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=780fb659-29e8-1ef4-4f62-97dacf36f6c8@gmail.com \
    --to=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=atull@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).