linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
	Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powernv/elog: Fix the race while processing OPAL error log event.
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 16:40:44 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9fn3o9v.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160187115555.1589942.2124270585910076829.stgit@jupiter>

Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> Every error log reported by OPAL is exported to userspace through a sysfs
> interface and notified using kobject_uevent(). The userspace daemon
> (opal_errd) then reads the error log and acknowledges it error log is saved
> safely to disk. Once acknowledged the kernel removes the respective sysfs
> file entry causing respective resources getting released including kobject.
>
> However there are chances where user daemon may already be scanning elog
> entries while new sysfs elog entry is being created by kernel. User daemon
> may read this new entry and ack it even before kernel can notify userspace
> about it through kobject_uevent() call. If that happens then we have a
> potential race between elog_ack_store->kobject_put() and kobject_uevent
> which can lead to use-after-free issue of a kernfs object resulting into a
> kernel crash. This patch fixes this race by protecting a sysfs file
> creation/notification by holding an additional reference count on kobject
> until we safely send kobject_uevent().
>
> Reported-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Change in v2:
> - Instead of mutex and use extra reference count on kobject to avoid the
>   race.
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-elog.c |   15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-elog.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-elog.c
> index 62ef7ad995da..230f102e87c0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-elog.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-elog.c
> @@ -222,13 +222,28 @@ static struct elog_obj *create_elog_obj(uint64_t id, size_t size, uint64_t type)
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * As soon as sysfs file for this elog is created/activated there is
> +	 * chance opal_errd daemon might read and acknowledge this elog before
> +	 * kobject_uevent() is called. If that happens then we have a potential
> +	 * race between elog_ack_store->kobject_put() and kobject_uevent which
> +	 * leads to use-after-free issue of a kernfs object resulting into
> +	 * kernel crash. To avoid this race take an additional reference count
> +	 * on kobject until we safely send kobject_uevent().
> +	 */
> +
> +	kobject_get(&elog->kobj);  /* extra reference count */

It's not really an "extra" reference.

The way the code is currently written there's one reference and it's
given to (moved into) sysfs_create_bin_file(). (Because elog_ack_store()
drops that reference).

So after that call this function no longer has a valid reference to
kobj.

If this function wants to continue to use kobj (which it does) it needs
its own reference.

Or the other way to think about it is that this code owns the initial
reference, and it needs to take a reference on behalf of the bin file
before creating the bin file.

So the patch is not wrong, but I think the comments are a bit
misleading.


>  	rc = sysfs_create_bin_file(&elog->kobj, &elog->raw_attr);
>  	if (rc) {
> +		kobject_put(&elog->kobj);
> +		/* Drop the extra reference count  */
>  		kobject_put(&elog->kobj);
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  
>  	kobject_uevent(&elog->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
> +	/* Drop the extra reference count  */
> +	kobject_put(&elog->kobj);
>  
>  	return elog;

And it is bogus that we return elog here, because we no longer have a
valid reference to it, so it may already be freed.

>  }

So please send a v3 with updated comments and the return dropped.

cheers

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-06  5:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-05  4:12 [PATCH v2] powernv/elog: Fix the race while processing OPAL error log event Mahesh Salgaonkar
2020-10-05 10:47 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2020-10-06  0:22   ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-10-06  5:11   ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2020-10-06  0:25 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-10-06  2:26   ` Vasant Hegde
2020-10-06  4:48   ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2020-10-06  5:40 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v9fn3o9v.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hegdevasant@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).