linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Timur Tabi <timur@kernel.org>, Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_sai: add IRQF_SHARED
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 10:43:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEnQRZCnQAUVowOJw5aPe9rYWU5DKR4bFbmQLYV2BzYqOhRJmQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191128223802.18228-1-michael@walle.cc>

On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 12:40 AM Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:
>
> The LS1028A SoC uses the same interrupt line for adjacent SAIs. Use
> IRQF_SHARED to be able to use these SAIs simultaneously.

Hi Michael,

Thanks for the patch. We have a similar change inside our internal tree
(it is on my long TODO list to upstream :D).

We add the shared flag conditionally on a dts property.

Do you think it is a good idea to always add shared flag? I'm thinking
on SAI IP integrations where the interrupt is edge triggered.

AFAIK edge triggered interrupts do not get along very well
with sharing an interrupt line.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-05  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-28 22:38 [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_sai: add IRQF_SHARED Michael Walle
2019-11-29 21:57 ` Fabio Estevam
2019-12-05  2:17 ` Nicolin Chen
2019-12-05  8:43 ` Daniel Baluta [this message]
2019-12-05  9:18   ` Michael Walle
2019-12-05  9:45     ` Daniel Baluta
2019-12-09 18:59 ` Applied "ASoC: fsl_sai: add IRQF_SHARED" to the asoc tree Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAEnQRZCnQAUVowOJw5aPe9rYWU5DKR4bFbmQLYV2BzYqOhRJmQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=daniel.baluta@gmail.com \
    --cc=Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=timur@kernel.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).