From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vgert.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 10:20:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210115102014.76e51309@lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210115171251.GF4384@sirena.org.uk>
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:12:51 +0000
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 04:47:18PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 02:24:46PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > + 3. Considerations
> > > + 3.1 Identifying successful termination
>
> > It looks like we forgot to update this with the addition of the new
> > section 3, so this needs a trivial update to add that and fix the
> > numbering.
>
> Bah, I thought the point with structured documentation formats was that
> tooling would handle stuff like this :/
The tooling *will* handle it if you let it, it's a simple matter of
replacing the hand-generated table of contents with a Sphinx directive. I
think that's generally the right thing to do, but it does have the
downside of only putting the TOC in the generated docs.
Thanks,
jon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-15 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-15 14:24 [PATCH v3] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace Mark Brown
2021-01-15 15:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-01-15 16:47 ` Mark Rutland
2021-01-15 17:12 ` Mark Brown
2021-01-15 17:20 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
2021-01-18 12:21 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210115102014.76e51309@lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vgert.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).