From: "Dieter Nützel" <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Linux Kernel List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Andrea Arcangeli" <andrea@suse.de>,
feedback@suse.de
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.3-ac12
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:26:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01042219261100.01104@SunWave1> (raw)
> My belief however is that several million people have gcc 2.96-69+, about 50
> are likely to have random cvs snapshots and none of them are going to build
> kernels with them anyway, as they wont work __builtin_expect or otherwise.
>
> Alan
I will not add fuel to the fire, but isn't 2.4.XX the "stable" version?
And I think most people (here in Europe :-) are running 2.95.2 at the moment.
But, yes the previously patches fixed it.
Thanks,
Dieter
--
Dieter Nützel
Graduate Student, Computer Science
University of Hamburg
Department of Computer Science
Cognitive Systems Group
Vogt-Kölln-Straße 30
D-22527 Hamburg, Germany
email: nuetzel@kogs.informatik.uni-hamburg.de
@home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de
next reply other threads:[~2001-04-22 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-22 17:26 Dieter Nützel [this message]
2001-04-22 19:53 ` Linux 2.4.3-ac12 J . A . Magallon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-22 13:48 f5ibh
2001-04-22 14:03 ` Jesper Juhl
2001-04-22 2:53 Alan Cox
2001-04-22 4:17 ` Manuel McLure
2001-04-22 5:47 ` junio
2001-04-22 6:07 ` junio
2001-04-22 10:42 ` Philip Blundell
2001-04-22 12:26 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 12:43 ` Philip Blundell
2001-04-22 12:54 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 13:00 ` Philip Blundell
2001-04-22 13:10 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 13:22 ` Russell King
2001-04-22 13:29 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 16:12 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-04-22 16:30 ` Mohammad A. Haque
2001-04-22 17:27 ` Roman Zippel
2001-04-22 17:43 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-04-22 18:42 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-23 6:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-04-22 13:51 ` Philip Blundell
2001-04-22 12:11 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 12:18 ` Russell King
2001-04-22 12:51 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 12:55 ` John Jasen
2001-04-22 13:00 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 8:57 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2001-04-22 12:20 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 13:04 ` Eyal Lebedinsky
2001-04-22 16:25 ` John Cavan
2001-04-22 17:07 ` Manuel McLure
2001-04-22 18:48 ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 18:57 ` Manuel McLure
2001-04-23 0:19 ` John Cavan
2001-04-23 8:35 ` Byeong-ryeol Kim
2001-04-23 22:18 ` Byeong-ryeol Kim
2001-04-22 22:46 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01042219261100.01104@SunWave1 \
--to=dieter.nuetzel@hamburg.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=feedback@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).