linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	<hkallweit1@gmail.com>, <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-master 1/1] net: phy: dp83867: Add speed optimization feature
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 14:10:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01797864-5a63-c3a0-d1d2-99dfff3a0aa1@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d194f979-ca6e-b33f-b18c-f8f238b66897@gmail.com>

Florian

On 1/31/20 2:02 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 1/31/20 11:54 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> <snip>
>> So then it would be ok to do a genphy_read_status and then override the
>> speed and duplex mode from the PHYSTS register?
> I would think so yes, especially if that is needed for reporting the
> actual link speed that ended up being negotiated, and not the one that
> the link was initially trained at. That assumes I understand that the
> problem is that you advertise and want Gigabit, but because of a 4-wire
> cable being plugged in, you ended up at 100Mbits/sec.

Exactly.

>> I don't think that the link change notification is needed.  The speed
>> should not change once the cable is plugged in and the speed is negotiated.
> The link change notification is just to signal to the user that the
> speed may have been reduced due to downshifting, which would/could
> happen with 4-wires instead of the expected 8-wires. Certainly not
> strictly necessary right now, I agree.

Ack

Dan


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-31 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-31 15:11 [PATCH net-master 0/1] DP83867 Speed optimization feature Dan Murphy
2020-01-31 15:11 ` [PATCH net-master 1/1] net: phy: dp83867: Add speed " Dan Murphy
2020-01-31 17:10   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-01-31 17:14     ` Dan Murphy
2020-01-31 18:11       ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-01-31 18:36         ` Dan Murphy
2020-01-31 17:49   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-01-31 18:29     ` Dan Murphy
2020-01-31 18:42       ` Florian Fainelli
2020-01-31 19:14         ` Dan Murphy
2020-01-31 19:29           ` Florian Fainelli
2020-01-31 19:54             ` Dan Murphy
2020-01-31 20:02               ` Florian Fainelli
2020-01-31 20:10                 ` Dan Murphy [this message]
2020-01-31 20:56   ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-02-01  1:30     ` Dan Murphy
2020-02-01  4:57       ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01797864-5a63-c3a0-d1d2-99dfff3a0aa1@ti.com \
    --to=dmurphy@ti.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).