linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: "Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Andrea Arcangeli" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	"Baoquan He" <bhe@redhat.com>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Łukasz Majczak" <lma@semihalf.com>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, "Qian Cai" <cai@lca.pw>,
	"Sarvela, Tomi P" <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] mm: refactor initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:27:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0255912b-19af-e8fc-9a04-06a519287716@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210216174914.GD1307762@kernel.org>

On 2/16/21 6:49 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Hi Vlastimil,
> 
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 05:39:12PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> So, Andrea could you please check if this fixes the original
>> fast_isolate_around() issue for you? With the VM_BUG_ON not removed, DEBUG_VM
>> enabled, no changes to struct page initialization...
>> It relies on pageblock_pfn_to_page as the rest of the compaction code.
> 
> Pardon my ignorance of compaction internals, but does this mean that with
> your patch we'll never call set_pfnblock_flags_mask() for a pfn in a hole?

No it doesn't mean that kind of guarantee. But we will not call it anymore (if
my patch is correct) from a path which we currently know it's doing that and
triggering the VM_BUG_ON. So that's a targetted fix that matches stable backport
criteria. It doesn't contradict your patch as a way to improve mainline, I still
agree it's best long-term if we initialize the struct pages without such
surprises. But I also agree with Michal that there's a risk of replacing one
corner case with another and thus we shouldn't do that as a stable fix.

      reply	other threads:[~2021-02-17 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-08 11:08 [PATCH v5 1/1] mm: refactor initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout Mike Rapoport
2021-02-08 21:11 ` Andrew Morton
2021-02-08 21:25   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-12  9:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-12  9:56   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-12 10:11     ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-12 10:16       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-12 10:37         ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-14 17:29     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-15  8:45       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-16 11:13         ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-12 10:33 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-12 10:42   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-12 13:18     ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-14 18:00       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-15  9:00         ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-15  9:05           ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-15 21:24           ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-16  8:33             ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-16 11:01               ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-16 11:39                 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-16 12:34                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-02-16 12:59                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-02-16 13:11                   ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-16 16:39                     ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-02-16 17:49                       ` Mike Rapoport
2021-02-17 12:27                         ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0255912b-19af-e8fc-9a04-06a519287716@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lma@semihalf.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).