linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
To: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] x86_64: increase stack size for KASAN_EXTRA
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 21:55:14 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <07c92470-7954-a1e1-5489-529134d738b8@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190109215209.2903-1-cai@lca.pw>



On 1/10/19 12:52 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
> If the kernel is configured with KASAN_EXTRA, the stack size is
> increasted significantly due to enable this option will set
> "-fstack-reuse" to "none" in GCC [1]. As the results, it could trigger
> stack overrun quite often with 32k stack size compiled using GCC 8. For
> example, this reproducer
> 
> https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/kernel/\
> syscalls/madvise/madvise06.c
> 
> could trigger a "corrupted stack end detected inside scheduler" very
> reliably with CONFIG_SCHED_STACK_END_CHECK enabled.
> 
> There are just too many functions that could have a large stack with
> KASAN_EXTRA due to large local variables that have been called over and
> over again without being able to reuse the stacks. Some noticiable ones
> are,
> 
> size
> 7648 shrink_page_list
> 3584 xfs_rmap_convert
> 3312 migrate_page_move_mapping
> 3312 dev_ethtool
> 3200 migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page
> 3168 copy_process
> 
> There are other 49 functions are over 2k in size while compiling kernel
> with "-Wframe-larger-than=" even with a related minimal config on this
> machine. Hence, it is too much work to change Makefiles for each object
> to compile without "-fsanitize-address-use-after-scope" individually.
> 
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81715#c23
> 
> Although there is a patch in GCC 9 to help the situation, GCC 9 probably
> won't be released in a few months and then it probably take another
> 6-month to 1-year for all major distros to include it as a default.
> Hence, the stack usage with KASAN_EXTRA can be revisited again in 2020
> when GCC 9 is everywhere. Until then, this patch will help users avoid
> stack overrun.
> 
> This has already been fixed for arm64 for the same reason via
> 6e8830674ea (arm64: kasan: Increase stack size for KASAN_EXTRA).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
> index 8f657286d599..0ce558a8150d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
> @@ -7,7 +7,11 @@
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_EXTRA
> +#define KASAN_STACK_ORDER 2

So the kernel stack becomes 4-order page. That's above PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER, so people
will start seeing fork() failures with -ENOMEM due to high memory fragmentation. I don't think
we can afford such change.

Give that use-after-scope has proven to be almost useless for the kernel, I think we should just
remove it entirely.

> +#else
>  #define KASAN_STACK_ORDER 1
> +#endif
>  #else
>  #define KASAN_STACK_ORDER 0
>  #endif
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-11 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-28  2:06 [PATCH] x86_64: increase stack size for KASAN_EXTRA Qian Cai
2019-01-09 21:52 ` [RESEND PATCH] " Qian Cai
2019-01-09 22:02   ` Andrew Morton
2019-01-10  4:20     ` Qian Cai
2019-01-11 18:55   ` Andrey Ryabinin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=07c92470-7954-a1e1-5489-529134d738b8@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).