Re: [PATCH V2 2/5] phy: phy-exynos-pcie: Add support for Exynos PCIe phy

[Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>]

Hi,

On 01/16/2017 05:37 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wednesday 04 January 2017 06:04 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> This patch supports to use Generic Phy framework for Exynos PCIe phy.
>> When Exynos that supported the pcie want to use the PCIe,
>> it needs to control the phy resgister.
>> But it should be more complex to control in their own PCIe device drivers.
>>
>> Currently, there is an exynos5440 case to support the pcie.
>> So this driver is based on Exynos5440 PCIe.
>> In future, will support the Other exynos SoCs likes exynos5433, exynos7.
> 
> please re-write the commit message.

Will update the commit-message

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> Changelog on V2:
>> - Not include the codes relevant to pci-exynos.
>> - Remove the getting child node.
>>
>>  drivers/phy/Kconfig           |   9 ++
>>  drivers/phy/Makefile          |   1 +
>>  drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c | 280 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 290 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>> index e8eb7f2..2dddef4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>> @@ -331,6 +331,15 @@ config PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD
>>  	  This driver provides PHY interface for USB 3.0 DRD controller
>>  	  present on Exynos5 SoC series.
>>  
>> +config PHY_EXYNOS_PCIE
>> +	bool "Exynos PCIe PHY driver"
>> +	depends on ARCH_EXYNOS && OF
> 
> include COMPILE_TEST

Ok.

>> +	depends on PCI_EXYNOS
> 
> PCI_EXYNOS should depend on PHY_EXYNOS_PCIE if at all required. Or else do away
> with this dependency.

Ok.

>> +	select GENERIC_PHY
>> +	help
>> +	  Enable PCIe PHY support for Exynos SoC series.
>> +	  This driver provides PHY interface for Exynos PCIe controller.
>> +
>>  config PHY_PISTACHIO_USB
>>  	tristate "IMG Pistachio USB2.0 PHY driver"
>>  	depends on MACH_PISTACHIO
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Makefile b/drivers/phy/Makefile
>> index 65eb2f4..081aeb4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/Makefile
>> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS4X12_USB2)	+= phy-exynos4x12-usb2.o
>>  phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5250_USB2)	+= phy-exynos5250-usb2.o
>>  phy-exynos-usb2-$(CONFIG_PHY_S5PV210_USB2)	+= phy-s5pv210-usb2.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5_USBDRD)	+= phy-exynos5-usbdrd.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS_PCIE)	+= phy-exynos-pcie.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_APQ8064_SATA)	+= phy-qcom-apq8064-sata.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_USB) += phy-rockchip-usb.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_ROCKCHIP_INNO_USB2)	+= phy-rockchip-inno-usb2.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..b57f49b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-pcie.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,280 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Samsung EXYNOS SoC series PCIe PHY driver
>> + *
>> + * Phy provider for PCIe controller on Exynos SoC series
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2016 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
> 
> 2017?

When i had posted the first version, it was 2016.. :)

>> + * Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>> +
>> +/* PCIe Purple registers */
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET		0x000
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET		0x004
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG		0x008
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET		0x00c
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_PLL_LOCKED		0x010
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSVREG_RESET		0x020
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV_RESET		0x024
> 
> Please use BIT() macro for bit definitions.

Ok.

>> +
>> +/* PCIe PHY registers */
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_IMPEDANCE		0x004
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_PLL_DIV_0		0x008
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_PLL_BIAS		0x00c
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_DCC_FEEDBACK		0x014
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_PLL_DIV_1		0x05c
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_COMMON_POWER		0x064
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_COMMON_PD_CMN		BIT(3)
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV0_EMP_LVL		0x084
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV0_DRV_LVL		0x088
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV0_RXCDR		0x0ac
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV0_POWER		0x0c4
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV0_PD_TSV		BIT(7)
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV0_LVCC		0x0dc
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV1_EMP_LVL		0x144
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV1_RXCDR		0x16c
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV1_POWER		0x184
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV1_PD_TSV		BIT(7)
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV1_LVCC		0x19c
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV2_EMP_LVL		0x204
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV2_RXCDR		0x22c
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV2_POWER		0x244
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV2_PD_TSV		BIT(7)
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV2_LVCC		0x25c
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV3_EMP_LVL		0x2c4
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV3_RXCDR		0x2ec
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV3_POWER		0x304
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV3_PD_TSV		BIT(7)
>> +#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV3_LVCC		0x31c
>> +
>> +struct exynos_pcie_phy_data {
>> +	struct phy_ops	*ops;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* For Exynos pcie phy */
>> +struct exynos_pcie_phy {
>> +	const struct exynos_pcie_phy_data *drv_data;
>> +	void __iomem *phy_base;
>> +	void __iomem *blk_base; /* For exynos5440 */
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void exynos_pcie_phy_writel(void __iomem *base, u32 val, u32 offset)
>> +{
>> +	writel(val, base + offset);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 exynos_pcie_phy_readl(void __iomem *base, u32 offset)
>> +{
>> +	return readl(base + offset);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* For Exynos5440 specific functions */
>> +static int exynos5440_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
>> +{
>> +	struct exynos_pcie_phy *ep = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>> +
>> +	/* DCC feedback control off */
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x29, PCIE_PHY_DCC_FEEDBACK);
>> +
>> +	/* set TX/RX impedance */
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xd5, PCIE_PHY_IMPEDANCE);
>> +
>> +	/* set 50Mhz PHY clock */
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x14, PCIE_PHY_PLL_DIV_0);
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x12, PCIE_PHY_PLL_DIV_1);
>> +
>> +	/* set TX Differential output for lane 0 */
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x7f, PCIE_PHY_TRSV0_DRV_LVL);
>> +
>> +	/* set TX Pre-emphasis Level Control for lane 0 to minimum */
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x0, PCIE_PHY_TRSV0_EMP_LVL);
>> +
>> +	/* set RX clock and data recovery bandwidth */
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xe7, PCIE_PHY_PLL_BIAS);
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x82, PCIE_PHY_TRSV0_RXCDR);
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x82, PCIE_PHY_TRSV1_RXCDR);
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x82, PCIE_PHY_TRSV2_RXCDR);
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x82, PCIE_PHY_TRSV3_RXCDR);
>> +
>> +	/* change TX Pre-emphasis Level Control for lanes */
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x39, PCIE_PHY_TRSV0_EMP_LVL);
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x39, PCIE_PHY_TRSV1_EMP_LVL);
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x39, PCIE_PHY_TRSV2_EMP_LVL);
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x39, PCIE_PHY_TRSV3_EMP_LVL);
>> +
>> +	/* set LVCC */
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0x20, PCIE_PHY_TRSV0_LVCC);
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xa0, PCIE_PHY_TRSV1_LVCC);
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xa0, PCIE_PHY_TRSV2_LVCC);
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, 0xa0, PCIE_PHY_TRSV3_LVCC);
> 
> I'm starting to dis-like all this hard-coded hw params. All this should come
> from dt. Define a dt binding like this for all hw params..
> 	phy,tx-differential = <val, reg-offset, mask>
> 
> and have one API in phy-core to do all these settings.

Will check.

>> +
>> +	/* pulse for common reset */
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->blk_base, 1, PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET);
>> +	udelay(500);
> 
> how did you get this delay value? Adding a comment might help.

Well..Actually i don't know why udelay(500) was defined.
When i had started the refactoring pci-exynos, there was one problem..
I didn't have Exynos5440 TRM and information..i can't check anything for exyno5440.
(I don't know who is using EXYNOS5440 pci.)

the entire codes are just moved from pci-exynos.c.

When i want to upstream exynos5433 pcie, first step is the cleaning pci-exynos.c relevant to exynos5440.
It was too complex to support the other Exynos SoCs.

Otherwise, it needs to add the new file for exynos5433.

>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->blk_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int exynos5440_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
>> +{
>> +	struct exynos_pcie_phy *ep = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>> +	u32 val;
>> +
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->blk_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET);
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->blk_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG);
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->blk_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_TRSVREG_RESET);
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->blk_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_TRSV_RESET);
>> +
>> +	val = exynos_pcie_phy_readl(ep->phy_base, PCIE_PHY_COMMON_POWER);
>> +	val &= ~PCIE_PHY_COMMON_PD_CMN;
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, val, PCIE_PHY_COMMON_POWER);
>> +
>> +	val = exynos_pcie_phy_readl(ep->phy_base, PCIE_PHY_TRSV0_POWER);
>> +	val &= ~PCIE_PHY_TRSV0_PD_TSV;
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, val, PCIE_PHY_TRSV0_POWER);
>> +
>> +	val = exynos_pcie_phy_readl(ep->phy_base, PCIE_PHY_TRSV1_POWER);
>> +	val &= ~PCIE_PHY_TRSV1_PD_TSV;
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, val, PCIE_PHY_TRSV1_POWER);
>> +
>> +	val = exynos_pcie_phy_readl(ep->phy_base, PCIE_PHY_TRSV2_POWER);
>> +	val &= ~PCIE_PHY_TRSV2_PD_TSV;
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, val, PCIE_PHY_TRSV2_POWER);
>> +
>> +	val = exynos_pcie_phy_readl(ep->phy_base, PCIE_PHY_TRSV3_POWER);
>> +	val &= ~PCIE_PHY_TRSV3_PD_TSV;
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, val, PCIE_PHY_TRSV3_POWER);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int exynos5440_pcie_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
>> +{
>> +	struct exynos_pcie_phy *ep = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>> +	u32 val;
>> +
>> +	while (exynos_pcie_phy_readl(ep->phy_base,
>> +				PCIE_PHY_PLL_LOCKED) == 0) {
>> +		val = exynos_pcie_phy_readl(ep->blk_base,
>> +				PCIE_PHY_PLL_LOCKED);
>> +		dev_info(&phy->dev, "PLL Locked: 0x%x\n", val);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	val = exynos_pcie_phy_readl(ep->phy_base, PCIE_PHY_COMMON_POWER);
>> +	val |= PCIE_PHY_COMMON_PD_CMN;
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, val, PCIE_PHY_COMMON_POWER);
>> +
>> +	val = exynos_pcie_phy_readl(ep->phy_base, PCIE_PHY_TRSV0_POWER);
>> +	val |= PCIE_PHY_TRSV0_PD_TSV;
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, val, PCIE_PHY_TRSV0_POWER);
>> +
>> +	val = exynos_pcie_phy_readl(ep->phy_base, PCIE_PHY_TRSV1_POWER);
>> +	val |= PCIE_PHY_TRSV1_PD_TSV;
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, val, PCIE_PHY_TRSV1_POWER);
>> +
>> +	val = exynos_pcie_phy_readl(ep->phy_base, PCIE_PHY_TRSV2_POWER);
>> +	val |= PCIE_PHY_TRSV2_PD_TSV;
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, val, PCIE_PHY_TRSV2_POWER);
>> +
>> +	val = exynos_pcie_phy_readl(ep->phy_base, PCIE_PHY_TRSV3_POWER);
>> +	val |= PCIE_PHY_TRSV3_PD_TSV;
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->phy_base, val, PCIE_PHY_TRSV3_POWER);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int exynos5440_pcie_phy_reset(struct phy *phy)
>> +{
>> +	struct exynos_pcie_phy *ep = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>> +
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->blk_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET);
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->blk_base, 1, PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET);
>> +	exynos_pcie_phy_writel(ep->blk_base, 0, PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct phy_ops exynos5440_phy_ops = {
>> +	.init	= exynos5440_pcie_phy_init,
>> +	.power_on = exynos5440_pcie_phy_power_on,
>> +	.power_off = exynos5440_pcie_phy_power_off,
>> +	.reset	= exynos5440_pcie_phy_reset,
> 
> add .owner

Will fix.

>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct exynos_pcie_phy_data exynos5440_pcie_phy_data = {
>> +	.ops		= &exynos5440_phy_ops,
> 
> why do you need a wrapper for phy_ops?

My main goal is the upstreaming exynos5433 pci, not exynos5440.
There are many different with exynos5440 and exynos5433.
As i know, only exynos5440 has the big different with other Exynos variants.

I think i can be removed in this patch. When i upstream the other SoCs, I will use the wrapper.

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id exynos_pcie_phy_match[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		.compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie-phy",
>> +		.data = &exynos5440_pcie_phy_data,
>> +	},
>> +	{},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, exynos_pcie_phy_match);
>> +
>> +static int exynos_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +	struct exynos_pcie_phy *exynos_phy;
>> +	struct phy *generic_phy;
>> +	struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
>> +	struct resource *res;
>> +	const struct exynos_pcie_phy_data *drv_data;
>> +
>> +	drv_data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>> +	if (!drv_data)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	exynos_phy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*exynos_phy), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!exynos_phy)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> +	exynos_phy->phy_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(exynos_phy->phy_base))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(exynos_phy->phy_base);
>> +
>> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
>> +	exynos_phy->blk_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(exynos_phy->phy_base))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(exynos_phy->phy_base);
>> +
>> +	exynos_phy->drv_data = drv_data;
>> +
>> +	generic_phy = devm_phy_create(dev, dev->of_node, drv_data->ops);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(generic_phy)) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to create PHY\n");
>> +		return PTR_ERR(generic_phy);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	phy_set_drvdata(generic_phy, exynos_phy);
>> +	phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate);
>> +
>> +	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver exynos_pcie_phy_driver = {
>> +	.probe	= exynos_pcie_phy_probe,
>> +	.driver = {
>> +		.of_match_table	= exynos_pcie_phy_match,
>> +		.name		= "exynos_pcie_phy",
>> +	}
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(exynos_pcie_phy_driver);
>>
> Thanks
> Kishon
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
>