From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@suse.de>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86/perf: Fix CR4.PCE propagation to use active_mm instead of mm
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:59:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c5b38a76ea50e405f9abe07a13dfaef87c173a1.1489694270.git.luto@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1489694270.git.luto@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1489694270.git.luto@kernel.org>
If one thread mmaps a perf event while another thread in the same mm
is in some context where active_mm != mm (which can happen in the
scheduler, for example), refresh_pce() would write the wrong value
to CR4.PCE. This broke some PAPI tests.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 7911d3f7af14 ("perf/x86: Only allow rdpmc if a perf_event is mapped")
Reported-and-tested-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/events/core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 349d4d17aa7f..4f564df73b8f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -2101,8 +2101,8 @@ static int x86_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
static void refresh_pce(void *ignored)
{
- if (current->mm)
- load_mm_cr4(current->mm);
+ if (current->active_mm)
+ load_mm_cr4(current->active_mm);
}
static void x86_pmu_event_mapped(struct perf_event *event)
--
2.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-16 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-16 19:59 [PATCH 0/2] x86/perf: A CR4.PCE bugfix and clarification Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-16 19:59 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2017-03-17 10:16 ` [tip:perf/urgent] x86/perf: Fix CR4.PCE propagation to use active_mm instead of mm tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-16 19:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/perf: Clarify why x86_pmu_event_mapped() isn't racy Andy Lutomirski
2017-03-17 10:17 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c5b38a76ea50e405f9abe07a13dfaef87c173a1.1489694270.git.luto@kernel.org \
--to=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=bpetkov@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).