On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 18:11, Brian Jackson wrote:

> p.s. Maybe you could keep your replies to constructive criticism, instead of 
> just dogging EVMS. Some people actually do want linux to improve. 

In case you missed is: EVMS is not the only way you can do volume
management in 2.5... and Christoph is pointing out valid design flaws
(and serious code bugs) in EVMS. Code bugs you can fix after merge;
design flaws should at least be discussed before merging in my opinion.