From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "Barry K. Nathan" <barryn@pobox.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>,
cw@f00f.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
geert@linux-m68k.org, perex@suse.cz,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: gcc 3.3: largest *and* smallest kernels (was Re: [PATCH] Isapnp warning)
Date: 22 Jun 2003 12:31:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1056281475.2075.15.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030622053909.GA5044@ip68-101-124-193.oc.oc.cox.net>
On Sul, 2003-06-22 at 06:39, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 07:17:05PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Compared to 2.95.3, gcc-3.3 takes 1.5x as long to compile, and produces a
> > kernel which is 200k larger.
> >
> > It is simply worthless.
>
> gcc 2.95.3 does compile faster than 3.3, but I don't think 3.3 is simply
> worthless:
With 2.95 people did benchmarks a long time back and -Os was outperforming
-O2 on some platforms at least. I'd bet the same is true with 3.3 on a
celeron too
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-22 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-15 18:36 [PATCH] Isapnp warning Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-06-21 12:31 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-21 14:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-06-21 15:04 ` Sean Neakums
2003-06-21 19:51 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-21 23:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-22 0:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-06-22 1:41 ` Chris Wedgwood
2003-06-22 1:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-06-22 2:17 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-22 2:27 ` Chris Wedgwood
2003-06-22 2:59 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-22 5:50 ` Herbert Xu
2003-06-22 3:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-22 4:24 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-06-22 8:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-06-22 13:34 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-22 5:39 ` gcc 3.3: largest *and* smallest kernels (was Re: [PATCH] Isapnp warning) Barry K. Nathan
2003-06-22 11:31 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2003-06-22 13:22 ` GCC speed (was " Daniel Phillips
2003-06-22 17:32 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-22 17:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-22 18:58 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2003-06-22 19:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-06-22 19:13 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-22 19:32 ` Henning Schmiedehausen
2003-06-22 19:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-06-22 19:12 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-23 1:05 ` Larry McVoy
2002-01-04 11:32 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-17 10:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-17 10:23 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-07-17 10:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-06-22 8:49 ` [PATCH] Isapnp warning Russell King
2003-06-22 8:39 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-22 14:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-22 15:00 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1056281475.2075.15.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=acme@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=barryn@pobox.com \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@suse.cz \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).