From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269700AbTGJXWk (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:22:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269702AbTGJXWk (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:22:40 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:12015 "EHLO hermes.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269700AbTGJXVy (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:21:54 -0400 Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.75 From: Robert Love To: Felipe Alfaro Solana Cc: Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1057879835.584.7.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> References: <1057879835.584.7.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1057880428.1984.12.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 (1.4.0-2) Date: 10 Jul 2003 16:40:29 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 16:30, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > I'm worried about the current status of the 2.5 kernel scheduler. I am sure Linus and Andrew will continue to take patches to tune the scheduler, as long as they are clearly tuning issues. I do not see it as a _huge_ problem, because we are just worrying about corner cases now. Worst case we can turn off the interactivity estimator - which is both the root of the improvement and the problems - and be back to where we are in 2.4. Robert Love