From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: David griego <dagriego@hotmail.com>
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, dsaxena@mvista.com, alan@storlinksemi.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Alan Shih: "TCP IP Offloading Interface"
Date: 15 Jul 2003 12:18:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1058267923.3845.23.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Sea2-F66GGORm1u51rM00012573@hotmail.com>
On Maw, 2003-07-15 at 00:26, David griego wrote:
> >Are these common cases to be optimized for latency or throughput?
> I would personaly see the common case optimized for throughput on large
> packets, and allow the smaller packets to be processed by the OS.
Its very very application dependant. Latency is critical to a good file
server, although storage people often like to handwave those numbers
away (not all of them thankfully)
Cluster people want low latency at all times, and latency is the one
thing that is almost impossible to recover once you lose time to it
next parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-15 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Sea2-F66GGORm1u51rM00012573@hotmail.com>
2003-07-15 11:18 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2003-07-14 21:51 Alan Shih: "TCP IP Offloading Interface" David griego
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-14 20:29 David griego
2003-07-14 20:23 David griego
2003-07-14 20:19 David griego
2003-07-14 20:31 ` Alan Shih
2003-07-14 20:34 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-14 21:53 ` Deepak Saxena
2003-07-17 22:31 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-07-14 19:43 David griego
2003-07-14 20:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-07-14 20:23 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-14 20:05 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-14 20:30 ` Shawn
2003-07-15 5:58 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-07-14 19:14 David griego
2003-07-14 19:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-07-15 12:42 ` Jesse Pollard
2003-07-14 19:46 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-14 18:46 David griego
2003-07-14 19:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-07-14 21:22 ` Deepak Saxena
2003-07-14 21:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-07-15 5:27 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-07-14 19:42 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1058267923.3845.23.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=alan@storlinksemi.com \
--cc=dagriego@hotmail.com \
--cc=dsaxena@mvista.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).