linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Disconnect <lkml@sigkill.net>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Feature proposal (scheduling related)
Date: 23 Jul 2003 12:55:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1058979335.1192.78.camel@slappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030723151321.GC29384@wind.cocodriloo.com>

Alternately, openbsd can do a similar thing with great results (although
I haven't tried it over serial/pppd.)  And it works reasonably well even
when done on only one end.

http://www.benzedrine.cx/ackpri.html

On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 11:13, Antonio Vargas wrote:

> You need QoS at the router level to resolve this. Since you are
> running your own routers to connect your ethernet segments, QoS
> should be done at both ends of the connection. If it's available
> on your distro, try wondershaper, it's a nice script which you tell
> your upstream and downstream rates and then it adjusts QoS parameters
> to provide great response. The most important thing is that it prioritises
> ACK packets above everything else. This helps a lot when there is heavy
> traffic (FTP for example) in both directions at the same time.

-- 
Disconnect <lkml@sigkill.net>


  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-23 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-23 10:57 Feature proposal (scheduling related) jimis
2003-07-23 11:24 ` David M. Wilson
2003-07-23 11:43 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-25 20:24   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-07-28  9:29     ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-23 14:17 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-07-23 14:23   ` Alan Cox
2003-07-23 15:10     ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-07-23 15:13       ` Antonio Vargas
2003-07-23 16:55         ` Disconnect [this message]
2003-07-23 17:22           ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 14:47   ` Greg Stark
2003-07-23 22:17   ` jimis
2003-07-24  0:58     ` Mike Fedyk
2003-07-24  4:04   ` Andre Tomt
     [not found] <cpvY.4hH.25@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-07-23 11:54 ` Ihar "Philips" Filipau
2003-07-23 12:42 Frederick, Fabian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1058979335.1192.78.camel@slappy \
    --to=lkml@sigkill.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).