From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fire Engine??
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 22:34:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1069882450.5219.1.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031126113040.3b774360.davem@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 866 bytes --]
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 20:30, David S. Miller wrote:
> > - Doing gettimeofday on each incoming packet is just dumb, especially
> > when you have gettimeofday backed with a slow southbridge timer.
> > This shows quite badly on many profile logs.
> > I still think right solution for that would be to only take time stamps
> > when there is any user for it (= no timestamps in 99% of all systems)
>
> Andi, I know this is a problem, but for the millionth time your idea
> does not work because we don't know if the user asked for the timestamp
> until we are deep within the recvmsg() processing, which is long after
> the packet has arrived.
question: do we need a timestamp for every packet or can we do one
timestamp per irq-context entry ? (eg one timestamp at irq entry time we
do anyway and keep that for all packets processed in the softirq)
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-26 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <BAY1-DAV15JU71pROHD000040e2@hotmail.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20031125183035.1c17185a.davem@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-11-26 9:53 ` Fire Engine?? Andi Kleen
2003-11-26 11:35 ` John Bradford
2003-11-26 18:50 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-11-26 19:19 ` Diego Calleja García
2003-11-26 19:59 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-11-27 3:54 ` Bill Huey
2003-11-26 15:00 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-26 23:01 ` Andi Kleen
2003-11-26 23:23 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-26 23:38 ` Andi Kleen
2003-11-26 19:30 ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26 19:58 ` Paul Menage
2003-11-26 20:03 ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26 22:29 ` Andi Kleen
2003-11-26 22:36 ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26 22:56 ` Andi Kleen
2003-11-26 23:13 ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26 23:29 ` Andi Kleen
2003-11-26 23:41 ` Ben Greear
2003-11-27 0:01 ` Fast timestamps David S. Miller
2003-11-27 0:30 ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2003-11-27 1:57 ` Ben Greear
2003-11-26 20:01 ` Fire Engine?? Jamie Lokier
2003-11-26 20:04 ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26 21:54 ` Pekka Pietikainen
2003-11-26 20:22 ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-11-26 21:02 ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26 21:24 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-11-26 21:38 ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26 23:43 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-11-26 21:34 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2003-11-26 22:58 ` Andi Kleen
2003-11-27 12:16 ` Ingo Oeser
2003-11-26 22:39 ` Andi Kleen
2003-11-26 22:46 ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26 0:15 Mr. BOFH
2003-11-26 2:30 ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26 5:41 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1069882450.5219.1.camel@laptop.fenrus.com \
--to=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).