> Well, on i386 we only run with HZ=100 and HZ=1000, so bug is latent,
> but if you can find nice way to rewrite it without the bug, it would
> probably be worth fixing.

Actually, the way I rewrote it in the patch is immune to that kind of
problem:

seq_printf(m, "\nbogomips\t: %lu.%02lu\n\n",
           HZ*(c->loops_per_jiffy>>3)/62500,
           (HZ*(c->loops_per_jiffy>>3)/625)%100);

It will work correctly for any HZ up to ~34000 bogomips (using 32-bit
arithmetic).

	Jean-Marc

-- 
Jean-Marc Valin, M.Sc.A., ing. jr.
LABORIUS (http://www.gel.usherb.ca/laborius)
Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada