linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Bastian Blank <bastian@waldi.eu.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: removing bcopy... because it's half broken
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:32:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1105439533.3917.22.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050111101010.GB27768@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>

On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 11:10 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 12:42:42PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > We're building with -ffreestanding now, so gcc isn't allowed to emit
> > > any calls to standard library functions.
> > Bzzt. It still emits calls to libgcc. 
> 
> Yes. This means IMHO that the image and every module needs to link
> against libgcc to include the required symbols. It is rather annoying to
> see modules asking for libgcc symbols.

I disagree with your first sentence: The kernel provides the required
symbols (bcopy is special here, it no longer gets emitted by gcc since
like gcc version 2.6); the ones the kernel does NOT provide are
generally undesirable in kernel spec, eg floating point and 64 bit
divisions...



  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-11 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-09 19:23 removing bcopy... because it's half broken Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-09 19:39 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-01-09 20:03 ` Russell King
2005-01-09 20:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-09 20:33   ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-09 20:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-09 20:42     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-11 10:10       ` Bastian Blank
2005-01-11 10:32         ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2005-01-11 16:10         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-09 23:38   ` Richard Henderson
2005-01-10  0:43   ` Adrian Bunk
2005-01-10 16:55     ` Matthias-Christian Ott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1105439533.3917.22.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bastian@waldi.eu.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).