linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>,
	"Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
	"Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"Tomasz Kłoczko" <kloczek@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl>,
	"Phil Oester" <kernel@linuxace.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, apiszcz@lucidpixels.com
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!?
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:13:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1137536034.19678.43.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0601172307030.7756@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>

On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 23:07 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > auto   Can be mounted with the -a option.
> >
> > defaults
> > Use default options: rw, suid, dev, exec,  auto,
> > nouser, and async.
> >
> > The default is async, no?
> 
> The server side also needs to specify async in exports. You even get a 
> warning if you do not specify sync or async, because the default had 
> been changed once.
> 

What is the date on the above man page?  Looks like the docs need to be
updated.

I believe the default was originally async, which violates the NFS spec
and is dangerous, and changed to sync at some point.

Lee


  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-17 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-17  1:07 Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!? Justin Piszcz
2006-01-17  1:23 ` Phil Oester
2006-01-17  1:32   ` Justin Piszcz
2006-01-17 17:48     ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2006-01-17 18:11       ` Alan Cox
2006-01-17 18:24         ` Justin Piszcz
2006-01-17 18:33           ` Alan Cox
2006-01-17 18:37           ` Trond Myklebust
2006-01-17 18:38             ` Justin Piszcz
2006-01-17 18:53               ` Trond Myklebust
2006-01-17 18:55                 ` Justin Piszcz
2006-01-17 19:01                   ` Trond Myklebust
2006-01-17 19:03                     ` Justin Piszcz
2006-01-17 20:39                     ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-17 20:45                       ` Justin Piszcz
2006-01-17 22:07                         ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-17 22:13                           ` Lee Revell [this message]
2006-01-17 23:19                             ` Justin Piszcz
2006-01-17 23:39                               ` Lee Revell
2006-01-18  0:43                                 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-01-17  9:50   ` Justin Piszcz
2006-01-17 17:10     ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1137536034.19678.43.camel@mindpipe \
    --to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=apiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=kernel@linuxace.com \
    --cc=kloczek@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).