linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Troy Benjegerdes <troy.benjegerdes@sifive.com>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>,
	ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Issue a local tlb flush if possible.
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:36:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <118B0DE7-EDCC-4947-88E5-7FF133A757D8@sifive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190810014309.20838-1-atish.patra@wdc.com>



> On Aug 9, 2019, at 8:43 PM, Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
> 
> In RISC-V, tlb flush happens via SBI which is expensive.
> If the target cpumask contains a local hartid, some cost
> can be saved by issuing a local tlb flush as we do that
> in OpenSBI anyways.

Is there anything other than convention and current usage that prevents
the kernel from natively handling TLB flushes without ever making the SBI
call?

Someone is eventually going to want to run the linux kernel in machine mode,
likely for performance and/or security reasons, and this will require flushing TLBs
natively anyway.


> 
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index 687dd19735a7..b32ba4fa5888 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #define _ASM_RISCV_TLBFLUSH_H
> 
> #include <linux/mm_types.h>
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <asm/smp.h>
> 
> /*
> @@ -46,14 +47,38 @@ static inline void remote_sfence_vma(struct cpumask *cmask, unsigned long start,
> 				     unsigned long size)
> {
> 	struct cpumask hmask;
> +	struct cpumask tmask;
> +	int cpuid = smp_processor_id();
> 
> 	cpumask_clear(&hmask);
> -	riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(cmask, &hmask);
> -	sbi_remote_sfence_vma(hmask.bits, start, size);
> +	cpumask_clear(&tmask);
> +
> +	if (cmask)
> +		cpumask_copy(&tmask, cmask);
> +	else
> +		cpumask_copy(&tmask, cpu_online_mask);
> +
> +	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpuid, &tmask)) {
> +		/* Save trap cost by issuing a local tlb flush here */
> +		if ((start == 0 && size == -1) || (size > PAGE_SIZE))
> +			local_flush_tlb_all();
> +		else if (size == PAGE_SIZE)
> +			local_flush_tlb_page(start);
> +		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpuid, &tmask);
> +	} else if (cpumask_empty(&tmask)) {
> +		/* cpumask is empty. So just do a local flush */
> +		local_flush_tlb_all();
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!cpumask_empty(&tmask)) {
> +		riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(&tmask, &hmask);
> +		sbi_remote_sfence_vma(hmask.bits, start, size);
> +	}
> }
> 
> -#define flush_tlb_all() sbi_remote_sfence_vma(NULL, 0, -1)
> -#define flush_tlb_page(vma, addr) flush_tlb_range(vma, addr, 0)
> +#define flush_tlb_all() remote_sfence_vma(NULL, 0, -1)
> +#define flush_tlb_page(vma, addr) flush_tlb_range(vma, addr, (addr) + PAGE_SIZE)
> #define flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end) \
> 	remote_sfence_vma(mm_cpumask((vma)->vm_mm), start, (end) - (start))
> #define flush_tlb_mm(mm) \
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-12 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-10  1:43 [PATCH] RISC-V: Issue a local tlb flush if possible Atish Patra
2019-08-10  3:30 ` Anup Patel
2019-08-10  5:28   ` Atish Patra
2019-08-10  6:37 ` Andreas Schwab
2019-08-10  9:21 ` Atish Patra
2019-08-12 14:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-13  0:15   ` Atish Patra
2019-08-13 14:30     ` hch
2019-08-15 20:37       ` Atish Patra
2019-08-19 14:46         ` hch
2019-08-19 15:09           ` Anup Patel
2019-08-19 15:10             ` hch
2019-08-20  0:02               ` Atish Patra
2019-08-12 15:36 ` Troy Benjegerdes [this message]
2019-08-12 17:13   ` Atish Patra
2019-08-12 17:55   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-13 18:25 ` Paul Walmsley
2019-08-14  1:49   ` Atish Patra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=118B0DE7-EDCC-4947-88E5-7FF133A757D8@sifive.com \
    --to=troy.benjegerdes@sifive.com \
    --cc=alexios.zavras@intel.com \
    --cc=allison@lohutok.net \
    --cc=anup.patel@wdc.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@sifive.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=rminnich@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).