From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753126Ab2AZQf4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:35:56 -0500 Received: from pyr75-3-78-192-68-46.fbxo.proxad.net ([78.192.68.46]:43362 "EHLO molly.corsac.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752004Ab2AZQfz (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:35:55 -0500 Message-ID: <1327595767.2062.7.camel@scapa> Subject: Re: [3.2+] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x10000100 From: Yves-Alexis Perez To: balbi@ti.com Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kuninori Morimoto , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:36:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20120126163130.GB8665@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> References: <1327587732.2296.25.camel@scapa> <20120126161539.GA2098@kroah.com> <20120126163130.GB8665@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-2TVWU/bDsrqAfEYOgoN8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-2TVWU/bDsrqAfEYOgoN8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On jeu., 2012-01-26 at 18:31 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Very odd, it wouldn't seem that this patch would cause such a problem, > > as it is "obviously" correct. >=20 > The funny thing is that I don't think there's any x86 system out there > with this *DRD* controller :-)=20 Out of curiosity, what is a DRD controler? > Specially when you consider the fact that > it's very recently that we dropped the ARCH dependency with commit > d242c110c43b55aaf3ebb3ceac1eeab0d452a177 >=20 > > Kuninori, any thoughts about this? Should I revert this from the > > tree? >=20 > I don't think so, I think this was a bad bisection. >=20 Maybe (especially since the first bad commit is a merge commit, so I'm not completely sure I did correctly the second bisect). But I'm puzzled why reverting the commit on top of 3.2.1 fixes that. And now that Felipe mentions it, USB Gadget is not even compiled, so I'm completely lost. --=20 Yves-Alexis --=-2TVWU/bDsrqAfEYOgoN8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCAAGBQJPIYD3AAoJEDBVD3hx7wuoTF8QAKtSkFYJ5lnqfAKRlu8pvMPw FP605BCXc4hsElm2H7RmcUd1iPaitOcrMP0OMF4CVf1FnLqYItAUhBxXGkgJ6yrg d90ro5fEcgOSsgYNQIXRck/wb2PwP77CvGwshL95xl3NiZgAE9GgUP1Pqmu/vNVM mCGjQhZB8g0r/4TXjEkW5jYQ7BLHZhLi744hS+zqabLmTb0/Z2pZ7H1H9A2Fdr2X XfhWj/CZjiretwPH48CcjUvegGUhOCLlOHM8B3Dtj1423RM34iOKJgG0pXjfvFiM IiaO0WTaRdKZ06xsCW7Cb7IeWkmBjDuPLdxPcn1rR9bZSM6fDujdNVwEgtbmzny4 46Ae0hgavc0i64gICJZzVJ7ugsaBBsX6/S5brlrX0hR+OQp+zuTa6gdVqVG7kl5h pfp0NQVGgFti7uITFrfhD+qbfWhvavTRJvjdg8qlRVdnZdYHn+Ut47lguQoAb9Dn JVuqlWYSNdkJlM4/+FCLH1S5G2rJ7QZFk2PKRkqy64susKPVT20/kSUoEYxfnj3m YB1LjcoZ54cWSEOK21ApFUFBXJT3fvH41bypS7j5v72DozFFFaqhNN3EMruWV+JS iQQNB4OlldgjewAXZxxCmdCpS5xj9vVwGwxQ83MnoNkueXcPgZK6nTjNi7WU7kde ZiTLVoNEJ+uAuV0yjWt+ =oD2s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-2TVWU/bDsrqAfEYOgoN8--