linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Safford <safford@watson.ibm.com>,
	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH v1 7/9] ima: add ima_inode_setxattr/removexattr function and calls
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:14:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1327961644-6886-8-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327961644-6886-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Based on xattr_permission comments, the restriction to modify 'security'
xattr is left up to the underlying fs or lsm. Ensure that not just anyone
can modify or remove 'security.ima'.

Changelog v1:
- Unless IMA-APPRAISE is configured, use stub ima_inode_removexattr()/setxattr()
  functions.  (Moved ima_inode_removexattr()/setxattr() to ima_appraise.c)

Changelog:
  - take i_mutex to fix locking (Dmitry Kasatkin)
  - ima_reset_appraise_flags should only be called when modifying or
    removing the 'security.ima' xattr. Requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN privilege.
    (Incorporated fix from Roberto Sassu)
  - Even if allowed to update security.ima, reset the appraisal flags,
    forcing re-appraisal.
  - Replace CAP_MAC_ADMIN with CAP_SYS_ADMIN
  - static inline ima_inode_setxattr()/ima_inode_removexattr() stubs
  - ima_protect_xattr should be static

Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/ima.h                   |   17 ++++++++++
 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c |   57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 security/security.c                   |    6 +++
 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/ima.h b/include/linux/ima.h
index e2bfbb1..2c7223d 100644
--- a/include/linux/ima.h
+++ b/include/linux/ima.h
@@ -44,10 +44,27 @@ static inline int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE
 extern void ima_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry);
+extern int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
+		       const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len);
+extern int ima_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name);
 #else
 static inline void ima_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry)
 {
 	return;
 }
+
+static inline int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry,
+				     const char *xattr_name,
+				     const void *xattr_value,
+				     size_t xattr_value_len)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int ima_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry,
+					const char *xattr_name)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_H */
 #endif /* _LINUX_IMA_H */
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
index 392ceb2..5fd90fc 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
@@ -168,3 +168,60 @@ void ima_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry)
 		rc = inode->i_op->removexattr(dentry, XATTR_NAME_IMA);
 	return;
 }
+
+/*
+ * ima_protect_xattr - protect 'security.ima'
+ *
+ * Ensure that not just anyone can modify or remove 'security.ima'.
+ */
+static int ima_protect_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
+			     const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len)
+{
+	if (strcmp(xattr_name, XATTR_NAME_IMA) == 0) {
+		if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+			return -EPERM;
+		return 1;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void ima_reset_appraise_flags(struct inode *inode)
+{
+	struct integrity_iint_cache *iint;
+
+	if (!ima_initialized || !ima_appraise || !S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
+		return;
+
+	iint = integrity_iint_find(inode);
+	if (!iint)
+		return;
+
+	iint->flags &= ~(IMA_COLLECTED | IMA_APPRAISED | IMA_MEASURED);
+	return;
+}
+
+int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
+		       const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len)
+{
+	int result;
+
+	result = ima_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value,
+				   xattr_value_len);
+	if (result == 1) {
+		ima_reset_appraise_flags(dentry->d_inode);
+		result = 0;
+	}
+	return result;
+}
+
+int ima_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name)
+{
+	int result;
+
+	result = ima_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, NULL, 0);
+	if (result == 1) {
+		ima_reset_appraise_flags(dentry->d_inode);
+		result = 0;
+	}
+	return result;
+}
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 556c64c..1203077 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -569,6 +569,9 @@ int security_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name,
 	ret = security_ops->inode_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size, flags);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
+	ret = ima_inode_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 	return evm_inode_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size);
 }
 
@@ -604,6 +607,9 @@ int security_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name)
 	ret = security_ops->inode_removexattr(dentry, name);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
+	ret = ima_inode_removexattr(dentry, name);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 	return evm_inode_removexattr(dentry, name);
 }
 
-- 
1.7.6.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-30 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-30 22:13 [RFC][PATCH v1 0/9] ima: appraisal extension Mimi Zohar
2012-01-30 22:13 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 1/9] vfs: extend vfs_removexattr locking Mimi Zohar
2012-01-30 22:13 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 2/9] vfs: move ima_file_free before releasing the file Mimi Zohar
2012-01-30 22:13 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 3/9] ima: integrity appraisal extension Mimi Zohar
2012-01-30 22:13 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 4/9] ima: add appraise action keywords and default rules Mimi Zohar
2012-01-30 22:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 5/9] ima: allocating iint improvements Mimi Zohar
2012-02-01 16:58   ` Eric Paris
2012-02-01 18:46     ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2012-02-09  9:40       ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2012-01-30 22:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 6/9] ima: add inode_post_setattr call Mimi Zohar
2012-01-30 22:14 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2012-01-30 22:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 8/9] ima: add support for different security.ima data types Mimi Zohar
2012-01-30 22:14 ` [RFC][PATCH v1 9/9] ima: digital signature verification support Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1327961644-6886-8-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=safford@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=zohar@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).