From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
greearb@candelatech.com, davidel@xmailserver.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 17:44:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1340000.1056847487@[10.10.2.4]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1056828052.6295.31.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
--Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote (on Saturday, June 28, 2003 20:20:53 +0100):
> On Sad, 2003-06-28 at 01:27, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>> That's a trivial change to make if you want it. we just add a "reviewed"
>> / "certified" state between "new" and "assigned". Yes, might be a good
>> idea. I'm not actually that convinced that "assigned" is overly useful
>> in the context of open-source, but that's a separate discussion.
>
> Most bugzilla's seem to use VERIFIED for this, and it means people who
> have better things to do can just pull bugs that are verified and/or
> tagged with "patch" in the attachments
Hmmm. we have VERIFIED set up to mean that the proposed fix has been
verified to work. Could reshuffle it, or we could find a different
word I guess - reusing the same one might cause confusion (on the
other hand ...using the same word for different things in different
bugzillas is confusing too ...)
M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-29 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-27 5:30 networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org David S. Miller
2003-06-27 5:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-27 5:47 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 7:59 ` Matti Aarnio
2003-06-27 8:00 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 15:00 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-27 14:34 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-27 14:56 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-27 21:37 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 21:54 ` Ben Greear
2003-06-27 21:54 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 22:15 ` Ben Greear
2003-06-27 22:19 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 22:36 ` Ben Greear
2003-06-28 0:00 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-28 0:15 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-28 0:32 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-28 0:19 ` Larry McVoy
2003-06-28 0:27 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-28 19:20 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-29 0:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-29 0:44 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-06-27 23:08 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-28 0:21 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-28 19:19 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-28 22:03 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-28 23:15 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-28 23:20 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-28 23:46 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-12 17:07 ` Jan Rychter
2003-07-13 4:15 ` Greg KH
2003-07-14 20:25 ` USB bugs (was: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org) Jan Rychter
[not found] ` <20030714230236.GA7195@kroah.com>
2003-07-15 20:24 ` Jan Rychter
2003-07-13 5:22 ` networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org David S. Miller
2003-07-13 5:42 ` Jan Rychter
2003-06-27 22:02 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-27 21:31 ` Ben Collins
2003-06-27 23:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-27 22:30 ` Ben Collins
2003-06-28 0:32 ` Larry McVoy
2003-06-28 19:26 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-28 0:38 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-28 1:14 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-28 2:13 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-28 2:35 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-28 6:08 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-28 3:27 ` Jamal Hadi
2003-06-27 22:02 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 22:11 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-27 22:13 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 18:50 ` Ben Greear
2003-06-27 21:44 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 22:47 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-27 22:53 ` Larry McVoy
2003-06-28 0:44 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-28 0:09 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-27 23:04 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-28 0:19 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-29 21:15 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-29 21:45 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-06-29 21:51 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-29 22:49 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-06-29 23:21 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-29 22:07 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-29 22:13 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-30 2:35 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-20 16:46 ` Petr Baudis
2003-06-27 15:25 John Bradford
2003-06-27 16:18 Nicolas Mailhot
2003-06-28 8:00 John Bradford
2003-06-28 8:10 John Bradford
2003-06-28 22:37 John Bradford
2003-06-29 22:28 John Bradford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='1340000.1056847487@[10.10.2.4]' \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm@bitmover.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).