From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752315AbcL2EjY (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2016 23:39:24 -0500 Received: from outbound.smtp.vt.edu ([198.82.183.121]:34366 "EHLO omr1.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752155AbcL2EjX (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2016 23:39:23 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6+dev To: Wolfram Sang Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=C3=83=C2=A1r?= , Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , Jean Delvare , Steven Honeyman , Jochen Eisinger , Gabriele Mazzotta , Andy Lutomirski , Mario Limonciello , Alex Hung , =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C3=83=E2=80=A6=C3=A2?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=82=AC=C5=A1_K=C3=83=E2=80=9E=C3=A2=E2=80=9E=C2=A2pie=C3=83?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=A6=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C5=BE?= , Takashi Iwai , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: Register optional lis3lv02d i2c device on Dell machines From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu In-Reply-To: <92e01f42db5129122dcf87f26f5e9917@the-dreams.de> References: <1482843136-12838-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <52345.1482878491@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <201612281005.22088@pali> <92e01f42db5129122dcf87f26f5e9917@the-dreams.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1482986267_31020P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 23:37:47 -0500 Message-ID: <134619.1482986267@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1482986267_31020P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 15:03:02 +0100, Wolfram Sang said: > > I have absolutely no idea how to you want to achieve calling that > > i2c_new_device() registration > > without kernel patches. > > Documentation/i2c/instantiating-devices lists all supported methods. > Method 4 is userspace instantiation. I'd be totally OK with userspace doing it, except for the question "How good will distros be about shipping it"? I don't have any sense of how good Fedora and Ubuntu and so on will be about making sure the userspace part is already done for the user. Anybody got evidence one way or another? --==_Exmh_1482986267_31020P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iQEVAwUBWGSTG40DS38y7CIcAQKRLAgAqGJmxbLH6GkO1RL1peOwb+scTttH0uOG gz/J/qvW7ik1tyjQptdmUcnv0FHGS3vN21hoZ7RCXu1TcZr9NXJF4OytXOxQlZ0a gHknQSI/aSnxHqSxpYM2E1hIcsj/RLhEpEVYUz0IjrFlBUKRJ/qk9Z1Tkao2s1R7 dCsiePnTI7pO+qF/kENM+Oo7n1v6GztrncwIm4dFNiHk/5NjfmoOQCsiaL0iR4TF CFpda4nw64IVMO+ISFfKFMXBozogYvp24Xk7Wzev0kKQRNfw2/8YTzfgWnZ8Pled CwsdsthDaSsVycuOg5gulocWQGxpYztlW8ODz2wx6b3Q9YUVgAZCpA== =J/Jn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1482986267_31020P--