From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759783Ab3BHBLp (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2013 20:11:45 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:47943 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759559Ab3BHBLo (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2013 20:11:44 -0500 Message-ID: <1360285890.5374.76.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> Subject: Re: Linux 3.2.38 From: Ben Hutchings To: tmhikaru@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:11:30 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20130207173630.GA8355@roll> References: <1360160863.32217.30.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> <20130207173630.GA8355@roll> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-GWRW7NjMGIe27SEBcfrl" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:470:1f08:1539:a11:96ff:fec6:70c4 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-GWRW7NjMGIe27SEBcfrl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 12:36 -0500, tmhikaru@gmail.com wrote: > Hmm. I'm not sure what's going on here but ever since I upgraded to > this kernel my CPU use has always been at 100% - various apps (top, pidst= at, > conky) give different reasons for this, conky&pidstat claims things like > X/the most active X application are cpu hogging, while top seems to think > the majority of cpu use is being done by 'sys' - the interesting thing > though is that my loadaverage is staying very close to zero. >=20 > I know that this is far from a useful bug report, but to be honest I > don't even know where to begin checking, so I'll start a git bisect of > 3.2.37 vs 3.2.38 tonight and see what happens. There weren't any scheduler changes in 3.2.38 so I can't make any better suggestion than to do that bisection. Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo= . --=-GWRW7NjMGIe27SEBcfrl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAURRQwue/yOyVhhEJAQqTSw//UqwqBwMDFTU6N+miACmH2HZGLtmEDDpC xJw9/iQp7iYvCnyzSYwUW28zQ3cE3MOZzhJkWNPJjdOamt9+dNJ3TA97JPncjJWu gue+qsag7iR/BPhUYoyjBubq4NZo+7Yz/SlZ9GGZW8SOcrrwIFLjiLRT9AzOFcz7 8S5htduUuJylZ/C+FYOofnloiggZIuyIVuiPams8y0VYtFn0fy7p+AEyEn0OpjEJ hTcslkpM0yjMlSYoShXueE6rGc5Z3OmJgCh2MgM7QZhkE+GcBxONGs2W35F0WsZo +xqnhSGOKeAMX5+35GGfwYMUcCUeebzAPKeHOzqxXN7R0EnRnejPfP/FhNzRPVWC y0Bmq9LXOAt5y7or3qS3gomly1+CU+CXzjW9vH5TyHSPEU9mqEkaFq7wiAi6Zeg/ 4Mk0yyGv4WjEohLjrrcMd8WTkG4ApCqTl5kEGNeGbnE0463na468Vm4SGtZ50foK JxgKkXGNVaO5qrfpHbZDOD4+6UtAzt5S3SlfwcaZav4ObAuiS+qVyVSxQ4EdyUFq V1EHIBDB6qdlIZJVN+CmluvSHHJfDCj0HvmJLvuZw4WkXKv+04i4yUaGUAR7TtIy gb8tKDg/ZyfxVzxCZgmJrrD4w9hOpO1QApFgAYWoZn90lDfk0AiRUru0Wpd6z27p TIb7wNVl8d8= =SVvT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-GWRW7NjMGIe27SEBcfrl--