linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, yuyang.du@intel.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, mgalbraith@suse.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/16] sched/fair: Compute task/cpu utilization at wake-up more correctly
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 11:58:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1464001138-25063-11-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464001138-25063-1-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com>

At task wake-up load-tracking isn't updated until the task is enqueued.
The task's own view of its utilization contribution may therefore not be
aligned with its contribution to the cfs_rq load-tracking which may have
been updated in the meantime. Basically, the task's own utilization
hasn't yet accounted for the sleep decay, while the cfs_rq may have
(partially). Estimating the cfs_rq utilization in case the task is
migrated at wake-up as task_rq(p)->cfs.avg.util_avg - p->se.avg.util_avg
is therefore incorrect as the two load-tracking signals aren't time
synchronized (different last update).

To solve this problem, this patch introduces task_util_wake() which
computes the decayed task utilization based on the last update of the
previous cpu's last load-tracking update. It is done without having to
take the rq lock, similar to how it is done in remove_entity_load_avg().

cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index ce44fa7..6d3369a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5304,6 +5304,75 @@ static inline int task_util(struct task_struct *p)
 	return p->se.avg.util_avg;
 }
 
+/*
+ * task_util_wake: Returns an updated estimate of the utilization contribution
+ * of a waking task. At wake-up the task blocked utilization contribution
+ * (cfs_rq->avg) may have decayed while the utilization tracking of the task
+ * (se->avg) hasn't yet.
+ * Note that this estimate isn't perfectly accurate as the 1ms boundaries used
+ * for updating util_avg in __update_load_avg() are not considered here. This
+ * results in an error of up to 1ms utilization decay/accumulation which leads
+ * to an absolute util_avg error margin of 1024*1024/LOAD_AVG_MAX ~= 22
+ * (for LOAD_AVG_MAX = 47742).
+ */
+static inline int task_util_wake(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	struct cfs_rq *prev_cfs_rq = &task_rq(p)->cfs;
+	struct sched_avg *psa = &p->se.avg;
+	u64 cfs_rq_last_update, p_last_update, delta;
+	u32 util_decayed;
+
+	p_last_update = psa->last_update_time;
+
+	/*
+	 * Task on rq (exec()) should be load-tracking aligned already.
+	 * New tasks have no history and should use the init value.
+	 */
+	if (p->se.on_rq || !p_last_update)
+		return task_util(p);
+
+	cfs_rq_last_update = cfs_rq_last_update_time(prev_cfs_rq);
+	delta = cfs_rq_last_update - p_last_update;
+
+	if ((s64)delta <= 0)
+		return task_util(p);
+
+	delta >>= 20;
+
+	if (!delta)
+		return task_util(p);
+
+	util_decayed = decay_load((u64)psa->util_sum, delta);
+	util_decayed /= LOAD_AVG_MAX;
+
+	/*
+	 * psa->util_avg can be slightly out of date as it is only updated
+	 * when a 1ms boundary is crossed.
+	 * See 'decayed' in __update_load_avg()
+	 */
+	util_decayed = min_t(unsigned long, util_decayed, task_util(p));
+
+	return util_decayed;
+}
+
+/*
+ * cpu_util_wake: Compute cpu utilization with any contributions from
+ * the waking task p removed.
+ */
+static int cpu_util_wake(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	unsigned long util, capacity;
+
+	/* Task has no contribution or is new */
+	if (cpu != task_cpu(p) || !p->se.avg.last_update_time)
+		return cpu_util(cpu);
+
+	capacity = capacity_orig_of(cpu);
+	util = max_t(long, cpu_rq(cpu)->cfs.avg.util_avg - task_util_wake(p), 0);
+
+	return (util >= capacity) ? capacity : util;
+}
+
 static int wake_cap(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int prev_cpu)
 {
 	long delta;
-- 
1.9.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-23 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-23 10:58 [PATCH 00/16] sched: Clean-ups and asymmetric cpu capacity support Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-23 10:58 ` [PATCH 01/16] sched: Fix power to capacity renaming in comment Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-23 10:58 ` [PATCH 02/16] sched/fair: Consistent use of prev_cpu in wakeup path Morten Rasmussen
2016-06-01 19:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-23 10:58 ` [PATCH 03/16] sched/fair: Disregard idle task wakee_flips in wake_wide Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-23 11:12   ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-23 12:00     ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-23 13:00       ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-23 14:10         ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-23 15:42           ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-23 23:17             ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-23 23:04       ` Yuyang Du
2016-06-01 19:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-02  8:05         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-07 12:08           ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-23 10:58 ` [PATCH 04/16] sched/fair: Optimize find_idlest_cpu() when there is no choice Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-24  6:29   ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-24  8:05     ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-24  8:12       ` Mike Galbraith
2016-06-01 19:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-07 14:25     ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-23 10:58 ` [PATCH 05/16] sched: Introduce SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY sched_domain topology flag Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-23 10:58 ` [PATCH 06/16] sched: Disable WAKE_AFFINE for asymmetric configurations Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-24  9:10   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-05-24 10:29     ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-24 12:12       ` Vincent Guittot
2016-05-24 13:16         ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-24 13:27           ` Vincent Guittot
2016-05-24 13:36             ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-24 13:52               ` Vincent Guittot
2016-05-24 15:02                 ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-24 15:53                   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-05-25  9:12                     ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-26  6:45                       ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-07 16:50                         ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-23 10:58 ` [PATCH 07/16] sched: Make SD_BALANCE_WAKE a topology flag Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-24 23:52   ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-25  9:27     ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-06-01 20:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-08  8:45     ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-23 10:58 ` [PATCH 08/16] sched: Store maximum per-cpu capacity in root domain Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-23 10:58 ` [PATCH 09/16] sched/fair: Let asymmetric cpu configurations balance at wake-up Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-24  0:04   ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-24  8:10     ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-24  7:03   ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-24  7:15     ` Mike Galbraith
2016-05-25  6:57   ` Wanpeng Li
2016-05-25  9:49     ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-25 10:29       ` Wanpeng Li
2016-05-25 10:54         ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-25 11:18           ` Wanpeng Li
2016-06-02 14:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-08 11:29     ` Morten Rasmussen
2016-06-08 14:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-23 10:58 ` Morten Rasmussen [this message]
2016-05-23 10:58 ` [PATCH 11/16] sched/fair: Consider spare capacity in find_idlest_group() Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-23 10:58 ` [PATCH 12/16] sched: Add per-cpu max capacity to sched_group_capacity Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-23 10:58 ` [PATCH 13/16] sched/fair: Avoid pulling tasks from non-overloaded higher capacity groups Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-23 10:58 ` [PATCH 14/16] arm: Set SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY for big.LITTLE platforms Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-23 10:58 ` [PATCH 15/16] arm: Set SD_BALANCE_WAKE flag for asymmetric capacity systems Morten Rasmussen
2016-05-23 10:58 ` [PATCH 16/16] arm: Update arch_scale_cpu_capacity() to reflect change to define Morten Rasmussen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1464001138-25063-11-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --to=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgalbraith@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=yuyang.du@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).