From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] proc, oom_adj: extract oom_score_adj setting into a helper
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 14:40:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1464266415-15558-3-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464266415-15558-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org>
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Currently we have two proc interfaces to set oom_score_adj. The legacy
/proc/<pid>/oom_adj and /proc/<pid>/oom_score_adj which both have their
specific handlers. Big part of the logic is duplicated so extract the
common code into __set_oom_adj helper. Legacy knob still expects some
details slightly different so make sure those are handled same way - e.g.
the legacy mode ignores oom_score_adj_min and it warns about the usage.
This patch shouldn't introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index be73f4d0cb01..23679673bf5a 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -1041,6 +1041,63 @@ static ssize_t oom_adj_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count,
return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, buffer, len);
}
+static int __set_oom_adj(struct file *file, int oom_adj, bool legacy)
+{
+ struct task_struct *task;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int err = 0;
+
+ task = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
+ if (!task) {
+ err = -ESRCH;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ task_lock(task);
+ if (!task->mm) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_task_lock;
+ }
+
+ if (!lock_task_sighand(task, &flags)) {
+ err = -ESRCH;
+ goto err_task_lock;
+ }
+
+ if (legacy) {
+ if (oom_adj < task->signal->oom_score_adj &&
+ !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) {
+ err = -EACCES;
+ goto err_sighand;
+ }
+ /*
+ * /proc/pid/oom_adj is provided for legacy purposes, ask users to use
+ * /proc/pid/oom_score_adj instead.
+ */
+ pr_warn_once("%s (%d): /proc/%d/oom_adj is deprecated, please use /proc/%d/oom_score_adj instead.\n",
+ current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), task_pid_nr(task),
+ task_pid_nr(task));
+ } else {
+ if ((short)oom_adj < task->signal->oom_score_adj_min &&
+ !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) {
+ err = -EACCES;
+ goto err_sighand;
+ }
+ }
+
+ task->signal->oom_score_adj = oom_adj;
+ if (!legacy && has_capability_noaudit(current, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
+ task->signal->oom_score_adj_min = (short)oom_adj;
+ trace_oom_score_adj_update(task);
+err_sighand:
+ unlock_task_sighand(task, &flags);
+err_task_lock:
+ task_unlock(task);
+ put_task_struct(task);
+out:
+ return err;
+}
+
/*
* /proc/pid/oom_adj exists solely for backwards compatibility with previous
* kernels. The effective policy is defined by oom_score_adj, which has a
@@ -1054,10 +1111,8 @@ static ssize_t oom_adj_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count,
static ssize_t oom_adj_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
- struct task_struct *task;
char buffer[PROC_NUMBUF];
int oom_adj;
- unsigned long flags;
int err;
memset(buffer, 0, sizeof(buffer));
@@ -1077,23 +1132,6 @@ static ssize_t oom_adj_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
goto out;
}
- task = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
- if (!task) {
- err = -ESRCH;
- goto out;
- }
-
- task_lock(task);
- if (!task->mm) {
- err = -EINVAL;
- goto err_task_lock;
- }
-
- if (!lock_task_sighand(task, &flags)) {
- err = -ESRCH;
- goto err_task_lock;
- }
-
/*
* Scale /proc/pid/oom_score_adj appropriately ensuring that a maximum
* value is always attainable.
@@ -1103,27 +1141,8 @@ static ssize_t oom_adj_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
else
oom_adj = (oom_adj * OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX) / -OOM_DISABLE;
- if (oom_adj < task->signal->oom_score_adj &&
- !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) {
- err = -EACCES;
- goto err_sighand;
- }
-
- /*
- * /proc/pid/oom_adj is provided for legacy purposes, ask users to use
- * /proc/pid/oom_score_adj instead.
- */
- pr_warn_once("%s (%d): /proc/%d/oom_adj is deprecated, please use /proc/%d/oom_score_adj instead.\n",
- current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), task_pid_nr(task),
- task_pid_nr(task));
+ err = __set_oom_adj(file, oom_adj, true);
- task->signal->oom_score_adj = oom_adj;
- trace_oom_score_adj_update(task);
-err_sighand:
- unlock_task_sighand(task, &flags);
-err_task_lock:
- task_unlock(task);
- put_task_struct(task);
out:
return err < 0 ? err : count;
}
@@ -1157,9 +1176,7 @@ static ssize_t oom_score_adj_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
static ssize_t oom_score_adj_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
- struct task_struct *task;
char buffer[PROC_NUMBUF];
- unsigned long flags;
int oom_score_adj;
int err;
@@ -1180,39 +1197,7 @@ static ssize_t oom_score_adj_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
goto out;
}
- task = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
- if (!task) {
- err = -ESRCH;
- goto out;
- }
-
- task_lock(task);
- if (!task->mm) {
- err = -EINVAL;
- goto err_task_lock;
- }
-
- if (!lock_task_sighand(task, &flags)) {
- err = -ESRCH;
- goto err_task_lock;
- }
-
- if ((short)oom_score_adj < task->signal->oom_score_adj_min &&
- !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) {
- err = -EACCES;
- goto err_sighand;
- }
-
- task->signal->oom_score_adj = (short)oom_score_adj;
- if (has_capability_noaudit(current, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
- task->signal->oom_score_adj_min = (short)oom_score_adj;
- trace_oom_score_adj_update(task);
-
-err_sighand:
- unlock_task_sighand(task, &flags);
-err_task_lock:
- task_unlock(task);
- put_task_struct(task);
+ err = __set_oom_adj(file, oom_score_adj, false);
out:
return err < 0 ? err : count;
}
--
2.8.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-26 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-26 12:40 [PATCH 0/5] Handle oom bypass more gracefully Michal Hocko
2016-05-26 12:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm, oom: do not loop over all tasks if there are no external tasks sharing mm Michal Hocko
2016-05-26 14:30 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-05-26 14:59 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-26 15:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm, oom: do not loop over all tasks if there are noexternal " Tetsuo Handa
2016-05-26 15:35 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-26 16:14 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm, oom: do not loop over all tasks if there are no external " Tetsuo Handa
2016-05-27 6:45 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-27 7:15 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-27 8:03 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-26 12:40 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-05-26 12:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm, oom_adj: make sure processes sharing mm have same view of oom_score_adj Michal Hocko
2016-05-27 11:18 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-27 16:18 ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-05-30 7:07 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-30 8:47 ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-05-30 9:39 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-30 10:26 ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-05-30 11:11 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-30 12:19 ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-05-30 12:28 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-26 12:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm, oom: skip over vforked tasks Michal Hocko
2016-05-27 16:48 ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-05-30 7:13 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-30 9:52 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-30 10:40 ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-05-30 10:53 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-30 12:03 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-26 12:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm, oom: kill all tasks sharing the mm Michal Hocko
2016-05-26 12:40 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm, oom: fortify task_will_free_mem Michal Hocko
2016-05-26 14:11 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-05-26 14:23 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-26 14:41 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-05-26 14:56 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-27 11:07 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-27 16:00 ` [PATCH 0/5] Handle oom bypass more gracefully Michal Hocko
2016-05-30 13:05 [PATCH 0/6 -v2] " Michal Hocko
2016-05-30 13:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] proc, oom_adj: extract oom_score_adj setting into a helper Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1464266415-15558-3-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).